Federal contractor · MARYLAND HEIGHTS, MO

WORLD WIDE TECHNOLOGY LLC

WORLD WIDE TECHNOLOGY LLC received $377.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 301 awards (−26% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $4.8B. Its largest customer was Defense Information Systems Agency ($143.9M). It also received $9.2M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$377.8M
New awards
301
Sole-source
6.3%
Single offer
24%
UEI
C8VFSNKTMQB6
Parent company
WORLD WIDE TECHNOLOGY HOLDING CO LLC
Other than small businessMinority-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $377.8M in FY2026 together.

  1. WORLD WIDE TECHNOLOGY LLCMARYLAND HEIGHTS, MO · Family page
    $377.8M
  2. $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 476MFY2017
  2. 459.6MFY2018
  3. 563.7MFY2019
  4. 485.7MFY2020
  5. 497.2MFY2021
  6. 494.6MFY2022
  7. 467.6MFY2023
  8. 483.5MFY2024
  9. 509.8MFY2025
  10. 377.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 9 awards
  2. 73 awards
  3. 56 awards
  4. 55 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. 21 awards
  7. 23 awards
  8. 1 awards
  9. 15 awards
  10. 8 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$345.8M92%
  2. Research & development$21M5.6%
  3. Other equipment & supplies$11M2.9%
  4. Construction & real property$53.6K0.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$3.5M0.9%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition30%
    US 39% · $114.8M
  • Sole-source awards6.3%
    US 30% · $23.7M
  • Single-offer competitions24%
    US 8.8% · $91.1M
  • Urgency justifications4.1%
    US 5.1% · $15.5M

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards
  2. Department of Justice · 7 awards
  3. Smithsonian Institution · 1 awards
  4. Department of Defense · 1 awards
  5. Department of Health and Human Services · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. EA BUNDLE$627.5M
    Defense Information Systems Agency· St. Louis County, MO· IT & telecom· Jun 29, 2021 – Jan 26, 2026· HC108421F0175
  2. Department of the Army· St. Louis County, MO· IT & telecom· Apr 30, 2026 – Jun 1, 2026· W519TC26FA277
  3. CISCO LSA$85.5M
    Department of Veterans Affairs· St. Louis County, MO· IT & telecom· Jul 23, 2024 – Sep 24, 2026· 36C10B24C0017
  4. Defense Information Systems Agency· San Diego County, CA· IT & telecom· Apr 24, 2026 – Jun 3, 2026· HC108426F0234
  5. Department of the Army· St. Louis County, MO· IT & telecom· Dec 27, 2024 – Mar 13, 2026· W58P0525F0003
  6. Defense Information Systems Agency· St. Louis County, MO· IT & telecom· Jun 2, 2026 – Jun 12, 2026· HC108426F0271
  7. Offices, Boards and Divisions· St. Louis County, MO· IT & telecom· Sep 19, 2024 – Aug 20, 2026· 15JPSS24F00000835
  8. Department of the Army· Harford County, MD· IT & telecom· May 27, 2021 – May 22, 2026· W56JSR21F0063

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

WORLD WIDE TECHNOLOGY LLC received $9.2M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 78 actions (68 new awards). Its largest program was 32.004 · Universal Service Fund - Schools and Libraries ($9.2M).

Assistance · FY2026
$9.2M
New awards
68
Actions
78
Since FY2021
$26.8M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 2.9MFY2021
  2. 2.1MFY2022
  3. 2.8MFY2023
  4. 9.8MFY2024
  5. 9.2MFY2026

By type

  1. Direct payments$9.2M100%

Top programs

  1. 32.004 · Universal Service Fund - Schools and Libraries$9.2M99.9%
  2. 32.005 · Universal Service Fund - Rural Health Care$8,5130.1%

Awarding agencies

Largest awards

  1. 32.004 · Universal Service Fund - Schools and Libraries· Federal Communications Commission· Direct payment for specified use· Aug 31, 2026 – Aug 31, 2026· SL-2599051123
  2. 32.004 · Universal Service Fund - Schools and Libraries· Federal Communications Commission· Direct payment for specified use· Aug 31, 2026 – Aug 31, 2026· SL-2699050242
  3. 32.004 · Universal Service Fund - Schools and Libraries· Federal Communications Commission· Direct payment for specified use· Jul 31, 2023 – Aug 31, 2026· SL-2399024720
  4. 32.004 · Universal Service Fund - Schools and Libraries· Federal Communications Commission· Direct payment for specified use· Aug 31, 2026 – Aug 31, 2026· SL-2599028128
  5. 32.004 · Universal Service Fund - Schools and Libraries· Federal Communications Commission· Direct payment for specified use· Aug 31, 2026 – Aug 31, 2026· SL-2599027217
  6. 32.004 · Universal Service Fund - Schools and Libraries· Federal Communications Commission· Direct payment for specified use· Aug 31, 2026 – Aug 31, 2026· SL-2699015841

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $372K (2 subawards)

2 sub-recipients

  1. T AND D COMMUNICATIONS, INC.$360K97%
    CORONA, CA · 1 subaward
  2. LOOP 1 LLC$12K3.2%
    CEDAR PARK, TX · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $144.4M (274 subawards)

30 primes

  1. LEIDOS, INC.$28.4M20%
    RESTON, VA · 50 subawards
  2. FAIRFAX, VA · 17 subawards
  3. HERNDON, VA · 25 subawards
  4. CHANTILLY, VA · 34 subawards
  5. LEIDOS, INC.$13.6M9.4%
    RESTON, VA · 53 subawards
  6. FAIRFAX, VA · 25 subawards
  7. RESTON, VA · 16 subawards
  8. MCLEAN, VA · 17 subawards
  9. LEIDOS, INC.$5.6M3.9%
    RESTON, VA · 4 subawards
  10. TULLAHOMA, TN · 3 subawards

Its reported sub-contracts equal 0.1% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $101.8M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $269.1M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $322.5M received
  • FY2024: $871.5K paid out · $296.3M received
  • FY2025: $7M paid out · $351.4M received
  • FY2026: $372K paid out · $144.4M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

11 companies · $8.3M reported

  1. SAN JOSE, CA · 2 subawards · Computer and peripheral equipment manufacturing
  2. NAVARRE, FL · 2 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. CHANTILLY, VA · 1 subaward · Software publishers

Primes that pay it

67 companies · $1.5B reported

  1. RESTON, VA · 403 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 417 subawards · Other miscellaneous manufacturing
  3. CHANTILLY, VA · 493 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 79 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. IRON BOW TECHNOLOGIES, LLC$1.3B−27% in FY2026
    HERNDON, VA · 54% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Information Systems Agency · Computer systems design and related servicesArmy · Computer and peripheral equipment manufacturingVeterans Affairs · Computer systems design and related services+3 more
  2. MICROSOFT CORPORATION$1.5B−17% in FY2026
    REDMOND, WA · 11 entities · 47% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Information Systems Agency · Computer systems design and related servicesOffices, Boards and Divisions · Computer systems design and related servicesDefense Health Agency · Computer systems design and related services+1 more
  3. NEW TECH SOLUTIONS, INC.$1.6B−24% in FY2026
    FREMONT, CA · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Information Systems Agency · Computer systems design and related servicesAir Force · Computer systems design and related servicesAir Force · Computer and peripheral equipment manufacturing+8 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of WORLD WIDE TECHNOLOGY LLC (2 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • WORLD WIDE TECHNOLOGY HOLDING CO., LLCAI match · 100%
PAC giving · 2026
$1,500
1 PAC

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Democratic$1,500100%

PACs sponsored

  • WORLD WIDE TECHNOLOGY HOLDING CO., LLC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (WWT PAC)$0 raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.