Federal contractor · OAK PARK, MI

GLOBAL SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC.

GLOBAL SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC. received $13.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 62 awards (+84% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $90.6M. Its largest customer was Departmental Offices ($6.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$13.7M
New awards
62
Sole-source
2.9%
Single offer
36%
UEI
VH3UE9S2T6E5
Small businessWoman-ownedMinority-owned8(a) program

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.3MFY2017
  2. 3.7MFY2018
  3. 5.3MFY2019
  4. 5.8MFY2020
  5. 5.9MFY2021
  6. 8.8MFY2022
  7. 15.5MFY2023
  8. 22.3MFY2024
  9. 7.5MFY2025
  10. 13.7MFY2026
  11. -112.3KFY2027

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 34 awards
  2. 3 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 8 awards
  6. 1 awards
  7. 2 awards
  8. Forest Service$85.5K0.6%
    1 awards
  9. 1 awards
  10. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$8.6M63%
  2. Professional services$5M37%
  3. Equipment maintenance$85.5K0.6%
  4. Research & development$5000.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition38%
    US 39% · $5.3M
  • Sole-source awards2.9%
    US 30% · $400K
  • Single-offer competitions36%
    US 8.7% · $4.9M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Justice · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Office of Procurement Operations· Oakland County, MI· IT & telecom· Sep 29, 2023 – Sep 28, 2026· 70RCSJ23FR0000018
  2. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration· Oakland County, MI· Professional services· Feb 24, 2023 – Feb 27, 2026· 75P00123F37002
  3. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Financial Resources· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· May 20, 2026 – May 20, 2026· 7571MN26F66002
  4. Departmental Offices· Oakland County, MI· IT & telecom· Sep 12, 2024 – May 15, 2026· 140D0424F1213
  5. Departmental Offices· Oakland County, MI· IT & telecom· Apr 8, 2026 – Jul 30, 2026· 140D0426F0356
  6. Departmental Offices· Oakland County, MI· IT & telecom· Aug 20, 2026 – Aug 28, 2026· 140D0426F0926
  7. U.S. International Development Finance Corporation· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Sep 28, 2021 – Mar 11, 2026· 77344421F0101
  8. Office of Inspector General· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Jul 22, 2021 – Sep 24, 2026· 2031LL21F00020

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $49.9K reported

  1. TOPEKA, KS · 1 subaward

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 36 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ALYN, INC.$30.9M+21% in FY2026
    ROSWELL, GA · 50% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDepartmental Offices · Computer systems design and related services
  2. GARRETT PARK, MD · 50% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDepartmental Offices · Computer systems design and related services
  3. OMNICOM CONSULTING GROUP, INC.$13.5M+26% in FY2026
    TARRYTOWN, NY · 31% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDepartmental Offices · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.