Federal contractor · VENTURA, CA

GPA TECHNOLOGIES, INC

GPA TECHNOLOGIES, INC received $299.8K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−83% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $44.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($299.8K).

Obligations · FY2026
$299.8K
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
VZHDHUJ2SF57
Small businessMinority-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.6MFY2017
  2. 6.7MFY2018
  3. 2.7MFY2019
  4. 3.1MFY2020
  5. 6.9MFY2021
  6. 3.2MFY2022
  7. 9.2MFY2023
  8. 9.4MFY2024
  9. 1.8MFY2025
  10. 299.8KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$299.8K100%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$299.8K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Ventura County, CA$299.8K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $299.8K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.7% · $299.8K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. HANDLING SYSTEM TECHNICAL SUPPORT$1.8M
    Department of the Navy· Ventura County, CA· Professional services· Aug 15, 2024 – Mar 10, 2026· N3943024F4199
  2. MULTI-ELEMENT TOW TEST (METT) 2 PREP$792.4K
    Department of the Navy· Ventura County, CA· Professional services· Sep 12, 2024 – Apr 28, 2026· N3943024F4086
  3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INTEGRATE THE HSG WINCH & HPU VAN, CONDUCTING FUNCTIONAL TESTS, INSTALLATION SUPPORT, CONDUCT SYSTEM INSPECTIONS AND TROUBLESHOOTING ON ENTIRE SYSTEM SHIPBOARD SYSTEM FOR SURTASS-E HSG-3.$499.8K
    Department of the Navy· Norfolk city, VA· Professional services· Aug 20, 2024 – Jan 27, 2026· N3943024F4200

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $143.1K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. OCEANETICS INC$143.1K100%
    ANNAPOLIS, MD · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $75.4K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $3.6M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $143.1K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $3.9M reported

  1. AKTARIUS LLC$3.6M
    PANAMA CITY, FL · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. OCEANETICS INC$143.1K
    ANNAPOLIS, MD · 1 subaward
  3. OASIS SYSTEMS, LLC$75.4K
    BURLINGTON, MA · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. JACOBS/HDR, A JOINT VENTURE (NAVFAC ATLANTIC SRM)$10.6M−57% in FY2026
    ARLINGTON, VA · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. NESER, ROOMSBURG & WORKMAN, P.C.$10.5M−37% in FY2026
    VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 91% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. SSFM-NOEI LLC$11.5M−88% in FY2026
    HONOLULU, HI · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.