Federal contractor · CHESAPEAKE, VA

GSTEK, INC.

GSTEK, INC. received $15.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 15 awards (−26% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $168.2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($10.5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$15.6M
New awards
15
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
11%
UEI
JPEFLMMTFDE9
Parent company
GSTEK, INC.
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 14.6MFY2017
  2. 13.4MFY2018
  3. 15.7MFY2019
  4. 15.8MFY2020
  5. 13.5MFY2021
  6. 18.1MFY2022
  7. 20.4MFY2023
  8. 19.9MFY2024
  9. 21.1MFY2025
  10. 15.6MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 7 awards
  2. 8 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$12.9M83%
  2. Professional services$2.7M17%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition11%
    US 39% · $1.7M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions11%
    US 8.8% · $1.7M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Anne Arundel County, MD· IT & telecom· Dec 5, 2024 – Jun 10, 2026· W91RUS25F0017
  2. Department of the Army· Monterey County, CA· IT & telecom· Sep 3, 2024 – Jun 2, 2026· W91RUS24F0225
  3. Department of the Navy· Duval County, FL· Professional services· Sep 22, 2021 – Jan 27, 2026· N0018921F3034
  4. Department of the Army· El Paso County, CO· IT & telecom· May 13, 2025 – Jun 4, 2026· W91RUS25FA039
  5. Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· IT & telecom· Nov 13, 2024 – May 15, 2026· W91RUS25F0002
  6. Department of the Navy· Chesapeake city, VA· IT & telecom· Dec 30, 2020 – Feb 10, 2026· N0018921F3003
  7. Department of the Navy· Virginia Beach city, VA· Professional services· Jan 15, 2025 – Apr 22, 2026· N6660425F3000
  8. Department of the Army· Richmond County, GA· IT & telecom· Feb 6, 2025 – Jun 2, 2026· W91RUS25F0039

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $433.7K reported

  1. YORK, PA · 2 subawards · Communications equipment manufacturing

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. A & T SYSTEMS, INC.$52.3M−33% in FY2026
    SILVER SPRING, MD · 57% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related servicesArmy · Wired telecommunications carriers
  2. SPIDER STRATEGIES, INC.$26.6M−23% in FY2026
    ARLINGTON, VA · 43% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
  3. SAN ANTONIO, TX · 43% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.