Federal contractor · SPRINGFIELD, IL

HANSON PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC

HANSON PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC received $2.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−66% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $28.8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($2.7M).

Obligations · FY2026
$2.4M
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
KQR8L9KR7CQ5
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3MFY2017
  2. 786.8KFY2018
  3. 1.6MFY2019
  4. 1.6MFY2020
  5. 1.7MFY2021
  6. 661.4KFY2022
  7. 3MFY2023
  8. 7.2MFY2024
  9. 6.9MFY2025
  10. 2.4MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$2.7M100%
    2 awards
  2. Department of State-$313.3K0.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$2.4M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Ventura County, CA$2.7M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. THE PURPOSE OF THIS TASK ORDER IS TO CONDUCT FACILITY INSPECTIONS OF SELECT HANGARS.$2.7M
    Department of the Navy· Ventura County, CA· Construction & real property· May 29, 2026 – May 29, 2026· N3943026F7006
  2. THIS TASK ORDER WAS TO PROVIDE FUNDING$1.8M
    Department of State· Construction & real property· Feb 7, 2019 – May 12, 2026· SAQMMA16F3657
  3. THE PURPOSE OF THIS TASK ORDER FOR INSPECTION AND LOAD-TESTING OF SELECT NAVY AND USMC HELICOPTER ROPE SUSPENSION TECHNIQUES (HRST) TRAINING TOWERS AND INSPECTION OF ENGINEERING EVALUATION OF TWO MAST TOWERS, CONTINENTAL US (CONUS).$1.8M
    Department of the Navy· Ventura County, CA· Construction & real property· Sep 19, 2025 – Apr 30, 2026· N3943025F0195

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $300.5K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $23.9K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $324.4K reported

  1. FSB FEDERAL DESIGN GROUP JV$300.5K
    OKLAHOMA CITY, OK · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS$23.9K
    URBANA, IL · 1 subaward

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. AH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, LLC$16.4M−33% in FY2026
    NEWPORT NEWS, VA · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. MAKERS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN LLP$14.6M−92% in FY2026
    SEATTLE, WA · 89% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. GEORGE CONSULTING LTD$14.6M+106% in FY2026
    NORTH CHARLESTON, SC · 89% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • HANSON PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INCAI match · 100%

PACs sponsored

  • HANSON PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INC PAC$35K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.