Federal contractor · MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA

HAWK RIDGE SYSTEMS LLC

HAWK RIDGE SYSTEMS LLC received $423.3K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (+673% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.9M. Its largest customer was National Aeronautics and Space Administration ($298.4K).

Obligations · FY2026
$423.3K
New awards
3
Sole-source
85%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
GEGGJB6D6GN1
Parent company
HAWK RIDGE SYSTEMS LLC
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 13.8KFY2017
  2. 84.8KFY2018
  3. 385.9KFY2019
  4. 189.6KFY2020
  5. 122.8KFY2021
  6. 119.7KFY2022
  7. 241.6KFY2023
  8. 311.9KFY2024
  9. 54.8KFY2025
  10. 423.3KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$362.9K86%
  2. IT & telecom$60.4K14%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition85%
    US 39% · $358.7K
  • Sole-source awards85%
    US 30% · $358.7K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Santa Clara County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Jul 21, 2026 – Jul 21, 2026· 80NSSC26P1056
  2. Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Apr 15, 2026 – Apr 15, 2026· N5523626P0034
  3. Department of the Navy· Santa Clara County, CA· IT & telecom· Dec 5, 2025 – Dec 5, 2025· N6449826P2017

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $136.6K (2 subawards)

2 primes

  1. UPPER MARLBORO, MD · 1 subaward
  2. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $131.6K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $51.5K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $136.6K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $319.7K reported

  1. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. UPPER MARLBORO, MD · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  3. YORK, PA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 9 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. XIPHOS SYSTEMS INC$407.1K+121% in FY2026
    MONTREAL, CAN · 38% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Computer and peripheral equipment manufacturing
  2. AITECH DEFENSE SYSTEMS INC$590.2K+1,239% in FY2026
    CHATSWORTH, CA · 38% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Computer and peripheral equipment manufacturing
  3. MIRACLE SOFTWARE SYSTEMS INC$319.2K−100% in FY2026
    NOVI, MI · 28% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Software publishersNavy · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.