Federal contractor · GREELEY, CO

HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION CO

HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION CO received $163.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (+467% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $493.1M. Its largest customer was U.S. Customs and Border Protection ($150M).

Obligations · FY2026
$163.4M
New awards
5
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
92%
UEI
H1KPDZLCMNR8
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION CO company family: 11 registered entities, $925.2M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION COTYSONS CORNER, VA · Family page
    $49.3M
  2. HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION CO.PHOENIX, AZ
    $426.5M
  3. HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION COHONOLULU, HI
    $220.8M
  4. HENSEL PHELPS - SHIMIZU JVGREELEY, CO
    $38.1M
  5. HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION COORLANDO, FL
    $17.8M

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 30.4MFY2017
  2. 20.7MFY2018
  3. 6MFY2019
  4. 21.1MFY2020
  5. 122.3MFY2021
  6. 6.1MFY2022
  7. 1.3MFY2023
  8. 93MFY2024
  9. 28.8MFY2025
  10. 163.4MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. U.S. Customs and Border Protection$150M92%
    2 awards
  2. Department of the Army$13.4M8.2%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$163.4M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Imperial County, CA$150M92%
  2. Laramie County, WY$11.1M6.8%
  3. El Paso County, CO$2.3M1.4%
  4. Weld County, CO$10K0.0%
  5. Jefferson County, KY$10K0.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition92%
    US 39% · $150M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions92%
    US 8.7% · $150M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. DESIGN-BUILD BORDER PATROL STATION (BPS), CALEXICO, CA.$150M
    U.S. Customs and Border Protection· Imperial County, CA· Construction & real property· Sep 25, 2026 – Sep 25, 2026· 70B01C26F00001021
  2. CONSTRUCT CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS FACILITY AT SCHRIEVER AFB, CO$145.5M
    Department of the Army· El Paso County, CO· Construction & real property· Sep 1, 2021 – Apr 14, 2026· W9128F21C0041
  3. CONSTRUCTION OF GBSD INTEGRATED COMMAND CENTER, F. E. WARREN AFB$119M
    Department of the Army· Laramie County, WY· Construction & real property· Jan 25, 2024 – May 27, 2026· W9128F24C0009
  4. SEED TASK ORDER FOR 70B01C26D00000024$10K
    U.S. Customs and Border Protection· Weld County, CO· Construction & real property· May 11, 2026 – May 11, 2026· 70B01C26F00000336
  5. INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) DESIGN BUILD AND DESIGN BID BUILD MULTIPLE AWARD TASK ORDER CONTRACT (MATOC) TO SUPPORT CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ENERGY RESILIENCE AND CONSERVATION INVESTMENT PROGRAM (ERCIP) NATIONWIDE.$10K
    Department of the Army· Jefferson County, KY· Construction & real property· Apr 17, 2026 – Apr 17, 2026· W912QR26FA108

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $63.7M (3 subawards)

1 prime

  1. TRIAD NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC$63.7M100%
    COLUMBUS, OH · 3 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2023: $0 paid out · -$2.2M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $32.6M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $63.7M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

110 companies · $71.7M reported

  1. KORANDO CORPORATION$10.4M
    TAMUNING, GU · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction
  2. FRANK M. BOOTH, INC.$5M
    MARYSVILLE, CA · 2 subawards · Nonresidential building construction
  3. W.T. DENTON MECHANICAL, INC.$4.6M
    CLOVIS, NM · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $314.9M reported

  1. CONSOLIDATED NUCLEAR SECURITY, LLC$149.6M
    FREDERICK, MD · 18 subawards · Facilities support services
  2. TRIAD NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC$96.2M
    COLUMBUS, OH · 4 subawards · Facilities support services
  3. PANTEXAS DETERRENCE, LLC$68.1M
    LYNCHBURG, VA · 7 subawards · Facilities support services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 11 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CLARK CONSTRUCTION GROUP LLC$3.8B+72% in FY2026
    BETHESDA, MD · 8 entities · 71% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Nonresidential building constructionPublic Buildings Service · Nonresidential building constructionArmy · Nonresidential building construction+2 more
  2. HARPER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.$1B−97% in FY2026
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 33% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Nonresidential building constructionArmy · Nonresidential building construction
  3. M. A. MORTENSON COMPANY$1B+5,400% in FY2026
    MINNEAPOLIS, MN · 27% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building constructionNational Institutes of Health · Nonresidential building constructionNavy · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.