Federal contractor · PHOENIX, AZ

HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION CO.

HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION CO. received $426.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (+797% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.6B. Its largest customer was Public Buildings Service ($426.5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$426.5M
New awards
5
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
95%
UEI
KC87NGP2E9N7
Parent company
HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION CO
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION CO company family: 11 registered entities, $925.2M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION COTYSONS CORNER, VA · Family page
    $49.3M
  2. HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION COHONOLULU, HI
    $220.8M
  3. HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION COGREELEY, CO
    $163.4M
  4. HENSEL PHELPS - SHIMIZU JVGREELEY, CO
    $38.1M
  5. HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION COORLANDO, FL
    $17.8M

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 5.8MFY2017
  2. 8.7MFY2018
  3. 3.7MFY2019
  4. 202.3MFY2020
  5. 100.4MFY2021
  6. 290.9MFY2022
  7. 55.8MFY2023
  8. 499.8MFY2024
  9. 47.5MFY2025
  10. 426.5MFY2026
  11. 26.7KFY2027

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Public Buildings Service$426.5M100%
    5 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$426.5M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Cochise County, AZ$396.7M93%
  2. Imperial County, CA$29.3M6.9%
  3. Yuma County, AZ$503.3K0.1%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition95%
    US 39% · $404.7M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions95%
    US 8.7% · $404.7M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. DESIGN-BUILD SERVICES FOR THE RAUL HECTOR CASTRO LAND PORT OF ENTRY IN DOUGLAS, AZ$374.9M
    Public Buildings Service· Cochise County, AZ· Construction & real property· Aug 26, 2026 – Aug 26, 2026· 47PB5426C0002
  2. DESIGN-BUILD SERVICES FOR THE EXPANSION & MODERNIZATION PROJECT AT THE SAN LUIS I LAND PORT OF ENTRY IN SAN LUIS, AZ$343.3M
    Public Buildings Service· Yuma County, AZ· Construction & real property· Sep 21, 2022 – Oct 6, 2026· 47PK0122C0005
  3. NEW AWARD 47PK0124C0011 - DESIGN BUILD SERVICES - NEW DOUGLAS COMMERCIAL LPOE, DOUGLAS, ARIZONA, AZ 85607$298.8M
    Public Buildings Service· Cochise County, AZ· Construction & real property· Sep 20, 2024 – Sep 29, 2026· 47PK0124C0011
  4. DESIGN BUILD SERVICES MODERNIZATION AND EXPANSION OF THE CALEXICO LAND PORT OF ENTRY PHASE 2B LOCATED IN CALEXICO, CALIFORNIA$213.8M
    Public Buildings Service· Imperial County, CA· Construction & real property· Jul 19, 2024 – Jul 1, 2026· 47PK0124C0007
  5. CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AS CONSTRUCTOR (CMC) SERVICES FOR THE MODERNIZATION AND EXPANSION OF THE CALEXICO WEST LAND PORT OF ENTRY PHASE 2A, CALEXICO, CALIFORNIA.$188.3M
    Public Buildings Service· Imperial County, CA· Construction & real property· Sep 27, 2019 – Aug 11, 2026· 47PK0119C0009

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $9.6M paid out · $250K received
  • FY2023: $3.9M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

110 companies · $71.7M reported

  1. KORANDO CORPORATION$10.4M
    TAMUNING, GU · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction
  2. FRANK M. BOOTH, INC.$5M
    MARYSVILLE, CA · 2 subawards · Nonresidential building construction
  3. W.T. DENTON MECHANICAL, INC.$4.6M
    CLOVIS, NM · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $314.9M reported

  1. CONSOLIDATED NUCLEAR SECURITY, LLC$149.6M
    FREDERICK, MD · 18 subawards · Facilities support services
  2. TRIAD NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC$96.2M
    COLUMBUS, OH · 4 subawards · Facilities support services
  3. PANTEXAS DETERRENCE, LLC$68.1M
    LYNCHBURG, VA · 7 subawards · Facilities support services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 11 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CLARK CONSTRUCTION GROUP LLC$3.8B+72% in FY2026
    BETHESDA, MD · 8 entities · 71% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Nonresidential building constructionPublic Buildings Service · Nonresidential building constructionArmy · Nonresidential building construction+2 more
  2. HARPER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.$1B−97% in FY2026
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 33% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Nonresidential building constructionArmy · Nonresidential building construction
  3. M. A. MORTENSON COMPANY$1B+5,400% in FY2026
    MINNEAPOLIS, MN · 27% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building constructionNational Institutes of Health · Nonresidential building constructionNavy · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.