Federal contractor · CHARLOTTE, NC

HEPACO LLC

HEPACO LLC received $250.9K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (+119% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $9.8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($200K).

Obligations · FY2026
$250.9K
New awards
5
Sole-source
96%
Single offer
5.0%
UEI
MVLLRG4QJHR8
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.1MFY2017
  2. 1.2MFY2018
  3. 612.7KFY2019
  4. 1MFY2020
  5. 585.5KFY2021
  6. 896.1KFY2022
  7. 2.5MFY2023
  8. 445.9KFY2024
  9. 114.5KFY2025
  10. 250.9KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 2 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$212.6K84%
  2. Facilities & utilities$39.8K16%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $252.4K
  • Sole-source awards96%
    US 30% · $239.8K
  • Single-offer competitions5.0%
    US 8.8% · $12.6K
  • Urgency justifications16%
    US 5.1% · $39.8K

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards
  2. Department of Homeland Security · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Norfolk city, VA· Construction & real property· Mar 30, 2026 – Mar 30, 2026· N4008526P0001
  2. U.S. Coast Guard· Carteret County, NC· Facilities & utilities· Aug 4, 2026 – Aug 4, 2026· 70Z08426FPORT0016
  3. Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons· Mecklenburg County, NC· Construction & real property· Jul 24, 2025 – Jun 11, 2026· 15B11425P00000188
  4. U.S. Coast Guard· Queen Anne's County, MD· Facilities & utilities· Aug 21, 2025 – Apr 20, 2026· 70Z08425FPORT0018
  5. National Park Service· St. Louis County, MO· Equipment maintenance· Jul 5, 2024 – Mar 5, 2026· 140P6224P0035

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $776.8K (12 subawards)

2 primes

  1. CINCINNATI, OH · 7 subawards
  2. NORFOLK, VA · 5 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $2.4M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $1.9M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $2.5M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $785.8K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $9M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $776.8K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

7 companies · $17.3M reported

  1. CINCINNATI, OH · 25 subawards · Remediation and other waste management services
  2. YORK, PA · 59 subawards · Ship and boat building
  3. LOS ANGELES, CA · 3 subawards · Remediation and other waste management services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 9 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. PARKS PORTABLE TOILETS, INC.$411.6K−71% in FY2026
    GOLDSBORO, NC · 46% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Remediation and other waste management servicesU.S. Coast Guard · Remediation and other waste management services
  2. TOA KANKYO CORPORATION.LTD$354.5K−2.1% in FY2026
    EBINA, JPN · 42% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Waste collection
  3. GRAYMAR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, LLC$456.4K+1,017% in FY2026
    MOSES LAKE, WA · 44% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Waste collectionU.S. Coast Guard · Remediation and other waste management servicesNavy · Remediation and other waste management services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.