Federal contractor · RESTON, VA

HGL-APTIM TECHNOLOGIES JV LLC

HGL-APTIM TECHNOLOGIES JV LLC received $31.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 8 awards (−34% vs FY2025). Since FY2024: $79.9M. Its largest customer was Department of Energy ($30.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$31.2M
New awards
8
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
EJYEU4H68Y28
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.4MFY2024
  2. 47.3MFY2025
  3. 31.2MFY2026
  4. 0FY2027

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 3 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$31.2M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Bergen County, NJ· Facilities & utilities· Feb 20, 2025 – Feb 27, 2026· W912DQ25F3014
  2. Department of Energy· Alameda County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Jan 29, 2026 – Oct 6, 2026· 89303326FEM400477
  3. Department of the Navy· Nassau County, NY· Construction & real property· Aug 18, 2025 – May 6, 2026· N4008525F0634
  4. Defense Logistics Agency· Contra Costa County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Apr 30, 2025 – Oct 15, 2025· SPE60325FA4K5
  5. Department of the Navy· Construction & real property· Sep 19, 2024 – Mar 12, 2026· N6247024F4162
  6. Defense Logistics Agency· Contra Costa County, CA· Facilities & utilities· May 14, 2026 – Jun 10, 2026· SPE60326FA4V2
  7. Department of the Navy· Fairfax County, VA· Construction & real property· Sep 19, 2024 – Apr 9, 2026· N6247024F4167
  8. Defense Logistics Agency· Contra Costa County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Mar 2, 2026 – Mar 4, 2026· SPE60326FA4R6

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. OVERLAND PARK, KS · 40% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Remediation and other waste management services
  2. ECC ENVIRONMENTAL LLC$66.2M−57% in FY2026
    BURLINGAME, CA · 49% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Remediation and other waste management servicesNavy · Remediation and other waste management services
  3. PIKA INTERNATIONAL, INC.$40.6M−72% in FY2026
    STAFFORD, TX · 2 entities · 40% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Remediation and other waste management services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.