Federal contractor · CENTENNIAL, CO

HPM, INC.

HPM, INC. received $6.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−59% vs FY2025). Since FY2021: $66.7M. Its largest customer was Internal Revenue Service ($6.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$6.7M
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
V1L9DRCL6837
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3.8MFY2021
  2. 8.5MFY2022
  3. 24.7MFY2023
  4. 6.7MFY2024
  5. 16.4MFY2025
  6. 6.7MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Internal Revenue Service$6.2M93%
    1 awards
  2. National Park Service$447.7K6.7%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$6.7M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Shelby County, TN$6.2M93%
  2. Larimer County, CO$316.1K4.7%
  3. Grand County, CO$95.4K1.4%
  4. Alamosa County, CO$36.2K0.5%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. ROMO 316133_RECONSTRUCT HOUSING AND INFRASTRUCTURE DESTROYED BY FIRE$25.8M
    National Park Service· Grand County, CO· Construction & real property· Apr 18, 2023 – Sep 24, 2026· 140P2023C0075
  2. GRSA 315541 REHAB EMPLOYEE HOUSING AT GREAT SAND DUNES NATIONAL PARK$13.3M
    National Park Service· Alamosa County, CO· Construction & real property· Aug 6, 2025 – Aug 24, 2026· 140P2025C0056
  3. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE UNINTERRUPTABLE POWER SUPPLY (UPS) SYSTEM AT THE MEMPHIS, TN IRS FACILITY.$6.2M
    Internal Revenue Service· Shelby County, TN· Construction & real property· Apr 21, 2026 – May 26, 2026· 2032H826F00028

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $49.7M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $225.2K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $216.7K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $50.1M reported

  1. M. C. DEAN, INC.$50.1M
    TYSONS, VA · 3 subawards · Building equipment contractors

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. KING CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC$27.2M+8.9% in FY2026
    MACHIAS, ME · 52% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Park Service · Residential building construction
  2. H2 CONSTRUCTION INC$21.9M+766% in FY2026
    MARTINSBURG, WV · 43% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveInternal Revenue Service · Nonresidential building construction
  3. LEGEND BUILDERS LLC$7.2M
    BOWLING GREEN, KY · 24% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Park Service · Residential building construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.