Federal contractor · LOUISVILLE, KY

HUMANA GOVERNMENT BUSINESS INC

HUMANA GOVERNMENT BUSINESS INC received $5.6B in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−14% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $65.5B. Its largest customer was Defense Health Agency ($5.6B).

Obligations · FY2026
$5.6B
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
ZE6ZM6NKSV43
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3.6BFY2017
  2. 5.4BFY2018
  3. 6.7BFY2019
  4. 6.9BFY2020
  5. 7.1BFY2021
  6. 7.7BFY2022
  7. 7.8BFY2023
  8. 8BFY2024
  9. 6.5BFY2025
  10. 5.6BFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Health & medical$5.6B100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Defense Health Agency· Jefferson County, KY· Health & medical· Jan 4, 2017 – Feb 10, 2026· HT940216C0001
  2. Defense Health Agency· Jefferson County, KY· Health & medical· Dec 22, 2022 – Jun 10, 2026· HT940223C0001

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $892.6M (3 subawards)

3 sub-recipients

  1. MADISON, WI · 1 subaward
  2. SKYBRIDGE RESOURCES, LLC$33M3.7%
    TAMPA, FL · 1 subaward
  3. INTERAPT LLC$25.4M2.8%
    LOUISVILLE, KY · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 16% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $9M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2022: $88.2M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2023: $327.9M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $1.1B paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $533.2M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2026: $892.6M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

38 companies · $2.9B reported

  1. MADISON, WI · 74 subawards · Insurance carriers
  2. COLUMBIA, SC · 1 subaward · Insurance carriers
  3. NORCROSS, GA · 4 subawards · Insurance carriers

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SACRAMENTO, CA · 25% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Health Agency · Insurance carriers
  2. PHOENIX, AZ · 42% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Health Agency · Insurance carriers
  3. EVERNORTH FEDERAL SERVICES INC$1.9B+7.9% in FY2026
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 9.6% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Health Agency · Insurance carriers

Showing the top 3 of 12 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • HUMANA INC.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$4.5M
18 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$17.3M
$17.3M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$541.1K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$4.9M
    12 reports
  2. 2024$4.8M
    13 reports
  3. 2025$4.5M
    18 reports
  4. 2026$3M
    8 reports

Top issues

  1. Medicare and Medicaid48 reports
  2. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code26 reports
  3. Defense14 reports
  4. Pharmacy14 reports
  5. Health issues10 reports
  6. Veterans3 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES49 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE49 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. S-3 Group$800K
    14 reports
  2. alb solutions$600K
    14 reports
  3. Tiber Creek Group$350K
    6 reports
  4. Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP$130K
    3 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$276.1K51%
  2. Democratic$265K49%

PACs sponsored

  • HUMANA INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$1.2M raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.