Federal contractor · TUPELO, MS

HYPERION TECHNOLOGY GROUP INC

HYPERION TECHNOLOGY GROUP INC received $807.7K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−74% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $36.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($550K).

Obligations · FY2026
$807.7K
New awards
4
Sole-source
75%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
FPYLSNACC9S6
Parent company
HYPERION TECHNOLOGY GROUP INC
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 5.3MFY2017
  2. 1.3MFY2018
  3. 3.7MFY2019
  4. 3.4MFY2020
  5. 6.7MFY2021
  6. 616.6KFY2022
  7. 9.3MFY2023
  8. 2.3MFY2024
  9. 3.1MFY2025
  10. 807.7KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$550K68%
    1 awards
  2. Department of the Air Force$200K25%
    1 awards
  3. Department of Veterans Affairs$54.1K6.7%
    1 awards
  4. Department of the Navy$3,6560.5%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$550K68%
  2. Research & development$200K25%
  3. Other equipment & supplies$54.1K6.7%
  4. Equipment maintenance$3,6560.5%

Where the work was performed

  1. Lee County, MS$807.7K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition75%
    US 39% · $607.7K
  • Sole-source awards75%
    US 30% · $607.7K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Army$550K
    Department of Defense · 1 awards
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs$54.1K
    Department of Veterans Affairs · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. SCALABLE PASSIVE ACOUSTIC REPORTING AND TARGETING NODE SYSTEM$1.1M
    Department of the Navy· Lee County, MS· Equipment maintenance· Jul 7, 2025 – Dec 19, 2025· M6785425F1023
  2. THREAT MAPPED PROTECTION AND SIMULATION TOOL (TMPAST) DEVELOPMENT SERVICES$550K
    Department of the Army· Lee County, MS· Professional services· Apr 28, 2026 – Apr 28, 2026· W912HZ26FA085
  3. SUAS DETECTION IN CLUTTERED ENVIRONMENTS$200K
    Department of the Air Force· Lee County, MS· Research & development· Mar 13, 2026 – Mar 13, 2026· FA700026P0024
  4. ANALOG SENSORS$54.1K
    Department of Veterans Affairs· Lee County, MS· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 22, 2026 – Sep 22, 2026· 36C25526P0299

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $1.7M (2 subawards)

1 prime

  1. THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI$1.7M100%
    HATTIESBURG, MS · 2 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $2.5M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $5.8M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $555.1K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $1.5M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $1.7M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

8 companies · $12.1M reported

  1. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION$4.8M
    RESTON, VA · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI$3M
    HATTIESBURG, MS · 3 subawards
  3. TORCH TECHNOLOGIES INC$2.6M
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 36 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. C-K COMPOSITES CO., LLC$3.6M−100% in FY2026
    MOUNT PLEASANT, PA · 54% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  2. FALMOUTH SCIENTIFIC INC$3.2M−3.3% in FY2026
    POCASSET, MA · 50% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingNavy · Communications equipment manufacturing
  3. ENTERPRISE ELECTRONICS CORP$3.9M−53% in FY2026
    ENTERPRISE, AL · 53% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingNavy · Communications equipment manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Hyperion Technology Group, Inc.AI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$260K
6 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$890K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$230K
    7 reports
  2. 2024$280K
    8 reports
  3. 2025$260K
    6 reports
  4. 2026$120K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations17 reports
  2. Defense4 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES17 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE17 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Icebreaker Strategies, LLC$680K
    13 reports
  2. Cornerstone Government Affairs, Inc.$210K
    10 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.