Federal contractor · ARLINGTON, VA

IDEAL INNOVATIONS INCORPORATED

IDEAL INNOVATIONS INCORPORATED received $12.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−49% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $216.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($7.7M).

Obligations · FY2026
$12.4M
New awards
4
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
11%
UEI
N43ZLV9NUHK5
Parent company
IDEAL INNOVATIONS INCORPORATED
Other than small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 8.8MFY2017
  2. 23.8MFY2018
  3. 22MFY2019
  4. 15.8MFY2020
  5. 21.2MFY2021
  6. 32.6MFY2022
  7. 27.1MFY2023
  8. 28.8MFY2024
  9. 24.1MFY2025
  10. 12.4MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$7.7M62%
    3 awards
  2. Federal Bureau of Investigation$4.7M38%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$11M89%
  2. Research & development$1.4M11%

Where the work was performed

  1. Arlington County, VA$12.2M98%
  2. Harrison County, WV$191K1.5%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition11%
    US 39% · $1.4M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions11%
    US 8.7% · $1.4M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. BIOMETRICS COLLECTION CAPABILITY TASK ORDER UNDER RESPONSIVE STRATEGIC SOURCING FOR SERVICES FOR AUTOMATED TOOLSET-ARMY AND THE NEXT GENERATION BIOMETRIC COLLECTION CAPABILITY$42.7M
    Department of the Army· Arlington County, VA· Professional services· Feb 25, 2022 – Jun 1, 2026· W909MY22F0013
  2. OPERATIONS SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE BIOMETRICS OPERATIONS DIRECTORATE (BOD)$19.4M
    Department of the Army· Arlington County, VA· Professional services· Sep 25, 2020 – Apr 23, 2026· W15QKN20F0763
  3. PROJECT BLOODHOUND GANG 2 - BAA$15.4M
    Department of the Army· Arlington County, VA· Research & development· Jun 28, 2021 – Jun 2, 2026· W911QX21C0021
  4. SCOR 22- ISBOS$9.1M
    Federal Bureau of Investigation· Arlington County, VA· Professional services· Jun 24, 2025 – Aug 26, 2026· 15F06725F0001020

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $583K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. DHPC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$583K100%
    WOODBRIDGE, NJ · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $143.7K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $237K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $401K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $143.7K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $156.2K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $583K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $1.7M reported

  1. PERATON ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS LLC$731.1K
    CHANTILLY, VA · 5 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. DHPC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$676.3K
    WOODBRIDGE, NJ · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. LEIDOS, INC.$225.6K
    RESTON, VA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. TEXAS A&M ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATION$41.1M−77% in FY2026
    COLLEGE STATION, TX · 56% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services
  2. SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$61.6M+59% in FY2026
    WEST LONG BRANCH, NJ · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services
  3. MORSECORP, INC$103.2M−10% in FY2026
    CAMBRIDGE, MA · 86% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Ideal Innovations IncorporatedAI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2024
$120K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2025
$290K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$120K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$120K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$50K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense9 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations4 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES9 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE9 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. MORAN GLOBAL STRATEGIES, INC.$260K
    9 reports
  2. Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough$30K
    1 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.