Federal contractor · WOODBRIDGE, NJ

DHPC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

DHPC TECHNOLOGIES, INC. received $1.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−41% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $330.8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($1.6M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.6M
New awards
4
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
FHTCKU2Y6PF6
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 28.3MFY2017
  2. 54.3MFY2018
  3. 52.2MFY2019
  4. 64.7MFY2020
  5. 44.7MFY2021
  6. 28.9MFY2022
  7. 32.2MFY2023
  8. 21.3MFY2024
  9. 2.7MFY2025
  10. 1.6MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 4 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$1.7M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $1.7M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.8% · $1.7M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Middlesex County, NJ· Professional services· Jan 17, 2020 – Apr 27, 2026· W56KGY20F0026
  2. Department of the Army· Harford County, MD· Professional services· Jan 2, 2020 – Apr 27, 2026· W56KGU20F0005
  3. Department of the Army· Middlesex County, NJ· Professional services· Apr 29, 2019 – Dec 2, 2025· W56KGY19F0057
  4. Department of the Army· Morris County, NJ· Research & development· Aug 21, 2024 – May 22, 2026· W15QKN24C0056

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $1.9M (5 subawards)

5 sub-recipients

  1. KONGSBERG, NOR · 1 subaward
  2. ARLINGTON, VA · 1 subaward
  3. GERMANTOWN, MD · 1 subaward
  4. FREDERICKSBURG, VA · 1 subaward
  5. LINDON, UT · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 118% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $9.6M paid out · $157.5K received
  • FY2022: $18.3M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2023: $1.2M paid out · $832.8K received
  • FY2024: $1.8M paid out · $2.4M received
  • FY2025: $16.7M paid out · $2.2M received
  • FY2026: $1.9M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

44 companies · $49.3M reported

  1. CANYON LAKE, TX · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  2. MELBOURNE, FL · 4 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. XANDER GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS LLC$5.3M
    BALDWIN, MD · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $5.6M reported

  1. PASCAGOULA, MS · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. SERCO INC$157.5K
    HERNDON, VA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MTA INC$25.9M−49% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services
  2. THOMPSON GRAY, INC.$23.7M−100% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 92% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services
  3. ACME GENERAL CORP$21.1M−32% in FY2026
    MORGANTOWN, WV · 82% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.