Federal contractor · LAGRANGE, GA

INTERFACE AMERICAS INC

INTERFACE AMERICAS INC received $20K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (+1,896% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $4.2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($18.6K).

Obligations · FY2026
$20K
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
7.0%
UEI
LHM7L6MMJMA6
Parent company
INTERFACE, INC.
Small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

4 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $19.2K in FY2026 together.

  1. INTERFACE AMERICAS INCLAGRANGE, GA · Family page
    $20K
  2. INTERFACE, INC.ATLANTA, GA
    $0
  3. $0
  4. INTERFACE INC.SCOTTSDALE, AZ
    -$722

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · jev-1.13.0 · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.5MFY2017
  2. 1.2MFY2018
  3. 398KFY2019
  4. 171.9KFY2020
  5. 125.6KFY2021
  6. 355.5KFY2022
  7. 153.9KFY2023
  8. 250.8KFY2024
  9. 1KFY2025
  10. 20KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$19K95%
  2. Professional services$1,0005.0%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition7.0%
    US 39% · $1,403
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions7.0%
    US 8.8% · $1,403
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Oklahoma County, OK· Other equipment & supplies· Apr 28, 2026 – Apr 28, 2026· FA813626P0005
  2. Department of the Air Force· Greene County, OH· Professional services· Jan 11, 2023 – Jan 22, 2026· FA800323C0005
  3. FURNITURE$2,806
    Department of State· Troup County, GA· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 10, 2021 – Oct 21, 2025· 19AQMM21F3780

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $185.7K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $43.2K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $53.1K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $314.4K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

10 companies · $2M reported

  1. FORT WORTH, TX · 4 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. LEXINGTON, MA · 6 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. FORT WORTH, TX · 4 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. C. G. COE & SON, INC.$618.2K+34% in FY2026
    BETHESDA, MD · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveState · Textile furnishings mills
  2. HO CHI MINH CITY, VNM · 25% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveState · Textile furnishings mills
  3. DELOS, INC.$223.3K+492% in FY2026
    CALHOUN, GA · 21% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveState · Textile furnishings mills

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.