Federal contractor · FORT WORTH, TX

INTEROPERABLE SYSTEMS GROUP LLC

INTEROPERABLE SYSTEMS GROUP LLC received $563.8K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−23% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $6.7M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($482.5K).

Obligations · FY2026
$563.8K
New awards
3
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
YZWCHHUACZH3
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 461.2KFY2017
  2. 656.7KFY2018
  3. 764.8KFY2019
  4. 422.3KFY2020
  5. 1.2MFY2021
  6. 575.7KFY2022
  7. 594.5KFY2023
  8. 700.7KFY2024
  9. 736.9KFY2025
  10. 563.8KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Air Force$482.5K86%
    2 awards
  2. Department of the Navy$81.3K14%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$563.8K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Tarrant County, TX$392.6K70%
  2. Kern County, CA$89.9K16%
  3. San Diego County, CA$81.3K14%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $563.8K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $563.8K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT AND REQUIREMENTS TOOL SET (ESMART) FOR TACTICAL DATA LINK (TDL) INTEROPERABILITY SOFTWARE AND TRAINING$1.1M
    Department of the Air Force· Tarrant County, TX· IT & telecom· Jan 22, 2024 – Jun 9, 2026· FA489024C0012
  2. MANDRIL I$399.1K
    Department of the Air Force· Kern County, CA· IT & telecom· Jun 15, 2022 – Mar 18, 2026· FA930222P0034
  3. MANDRIL AND CIVET SOFTWARE LICENSES$328.2K
    Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· IT & telecom· Aug 15, 2023 – May 27, 2026· M6890923P7710

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $62.5K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $76.5K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $123.6K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $420.3K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $30.4K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $713.2K reported

  1. J.F. TAYLOR, INC.$350.3K
    LEXINGTON PARK, MD · 5 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$332.5K
    FORT WORTH, TX · 4 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. THE MITRE CORPORATION$30.4K
    MC LEAN, VA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ENTERPRISE INTEGRATION, INC$2M−44% in FY2026
    SALT LAKE CITY, UT · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Software publishersAir Force · Software publishers
  2. CODECLINIC LLC$1.4M−100% in FY2026
    NORTH READING, MA · 57% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Software publishers
  3. VERITONE, INC.$1.5M−94% in FY2026
    DENVER, CO · 57% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Software publishers

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.