Federal contractor · VIRGINIA BEACH, VA

ITMS, INC.

ITMS, INC. received $550.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 24 awards (−83% vs FY2025). Since FY2018: $44.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($503.9K).

Obligations · FY2026
$550.2K
New awards
24
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
KTKYUKMP42G8
Small businessWoman-ownedMinority-owned8(a) programHUBZone firm

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 42KFY2018
  2. 6.5MFY2019
  3. 7.7MFY2020
  4. 7.3MFY2021
  5. 8.3MFY2022
  6. 7.7MFY2023
  7. 3.4MFY2024
  8. 3.2MFY2025
  9. 550.2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 21 awards
  2. 2 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$503.9K92%
  2. Facilities & utilities$46.3K8.4%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $550.2K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $550.2K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 4 awards

Largest awards

  1. U.S. Special Operations Command· San Diego County, CA· Professional services· Sep 23, 2022 – Feb 25, 2026· H9224022P0069
  2. Department of the Army· Chesterfield County, VA· Education & social services· Apr 8, 2022 – Dec 10, 2025· W15QKN22C5005
  3. Department of the Army· Van Buren County, TN· Facilities & utilities· Jul 30, 2025 – Apr 13, 2026· W9128F25FA070
  4. Department of the Navy· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Sep 7, 2023 – Nov 21, 2025· N6247023F4177
  5. Department of the Navy· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· May 22, 2026 – May 22, 2026· N6247026F0045
  6. Department of the Navy· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Nov 20, 2025 – Dec 2, 2025· N6247026F0001
  7. Department of the Navy· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Mar 4, 2026 – Mar 4, 2026· N6247026F0033
  8. Department of the Navy· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Nov 22, 2024 – Dec 30, 2025· N6247025F0002

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $92.2K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $19.2K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $232.1K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $343.4K reported

  1. AGVIQ LLC$232.1K
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 1 subaward · Remediation and other waste management services
  2. MINNEAPOLIS, MN · 2 subawards · Nonresidential building construction

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. P.U. SEPTIC SERVICE, INC.$3.2M−35% in FY2026
    SOMERTON, AZ · 32% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Remediation and other waste management servicesNavy · Remediation and other waste management services
  2. EAST DUBLIN, GA · 32% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Remediation and other waste management servicesNavy · Remediation and other waste management services
  3. CHESAPEAKE, VA · 35% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Special Operations Command · Other professional, scientific, and technical services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.