Federal contractor · DALLAS, TX

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC received $4.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 28 awards (−41% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $123.4M. Its largest customer was National Aeronautics and Space Administration ($4.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$4.6M
New awards
28
Sole-source
93%
Single offer
3.8%
UEI
MKCAUUG2K7H6
Parent company
JACOBS SOLUTIONS, INC
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the CH2M HILL, INC company family: 92 registered entities, $528.8M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. CH2M HILL, INCENGLEWOOD, CO · Family page
    $54.4M
  2. JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC.ARLINGTON, VA
    $282.9M
  3. JACOBS GOVERNMENT SERVICES COMPANYARLINGTON, VA
    $82.2M
  4. JACOBS/B&V, A JOINT VENTURE (FEDERAL SERVICES)HONOLULU, HI
    $24.7M
  5. CH2M HILL CONSTRUCTORS, INC.ENGLEWOOD, CO
    $24.7M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.7MFY2017
  2. 1.5MFY2018
  3. 14.2MFY2019
  4. 15.1MFY2020
  5. 19.1MFY2021
  6. 13.1MFY2022
  7. 23.3MFY2023
  8. 23.2MFY2024
  9. 7.7MFY2025
  10. 4.6MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration$4.3M94%
    17 awards
  2. Department of the Air Force$267.8K5.9%
    2 awards
  3. Department of the Army$72.2K1.6%
    5 awards
  4. Bureau of Reclamation$00.0%
    2 awards
  5. Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education-$48.9K0.0%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$4.6M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Ventura County, CA$4.3M94%
  2. Dallas County, TX$607K13%
  3. Davis County, UT$267.8K5.9%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition96%
    US 39% · $4.4M
  • Sole-source awards93%
    US 30% · $4.2M
  • Single-offer competitions3.8%
    US 8.8% · $173.8K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration$4.3M
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 3 awards

Largest awards

  1. AE TASK ORDER FOR PACKAGE A DESIGN EFFORT TO SUPPORT THE AFMC HQ RENOVATION PROJECT AT WPAFB, OH.$7M
    Department of the Army· Dallas County, TX· Construction & real property· Aug 13, 2021 – Jan 28, 2026· W912QR21F0319
  2. CAFB DEPLOYMENT PROCESSING CENTER AE TO - AWARDING BASE ONLY$2.9M
    Department of the Army· Dallas County, TX· Construction & real property· Oct 23, 2023 – Mar 5, 2026· W912PP24F0005
  3. SSFL ON-SITE SUPPORT. JE039$1.9M
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Ventura County, CA· Construction & real property· Jan 15, 2025 – Jan 13, 2026· 80MSFC25FA029
  4. SSFL SSFL SW PCP GW SAMPLING JE036$1.8M
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Ventura County, CA· Construction & real property· Jan 8, 2025 – Feb 5, 2026· 80MSFC25FA025
  5. THE PURPOSE OF THIS TASK ORDER IS TO CONDUCT THE ROUTINE FIELDWORK AND REPORTING FOR THE SEMIANNUAL GROUNDWATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS AND GROUNDWATER SAMPLING ASSOCIATED WITH THE REVISED SITEWIDE WQSAP.$1.6M
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Ventura County, CA· Construction & real property· Feb 6, 2025 – Apr 10, 2026· 80MSFC25FA030
  6. THE PURPOSE OF THIS TASK ORDER IS TO PROCURE TECHNICAL CONSULTATION SUPPORT FOR THE SSFL REMEDIATION PROGRAM.$1.3M
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Ventura County, CA· Construction & real property· Apr 17, 2023 – Mar 31, 2026· 80MSFC23FA020
  7. DESIGN OF THE DEPLOYMENT PROCESSING CENTER INCLUDES REINFORCED CONCRETE FOUNDATIONS, CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB, STRUCTURAL STEEL FRAME WITH SPLIT FACED CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT FACADE AND A METAL ROOF. APPROXIMATELY 52,000 SQ. FT.$974K
    Department of the Army· Dallas County, TX· Construction & real property· Apr 30, 2026 – Apr 30, 2026· W912PP26FA011
  8. JE018 SSFL CY2024 CONTINUED AIR MONITORING SUPPORT$929.3K
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Ventura County, CA· Construction & real property· Dec 18, 2023 – Jul 1, 2026· 80MSFC24FA009

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $809.3K (24 subawards)

14 sub-recipients

  1. EUROFINS ENVIRONMENT TESTING SOUTHWEST, LLC$358.8K44%
    PHOENIX, AZ · 2 subawards
  2. ACORN CONSULTING, INC$212K26%
    PORT CHARLOTTE, FL · 2 subawards
  3. NOREAS, INC.$87.9K11%
    IRVINE, CA · 1 subaward
  4. BLAINE TECH SERVICES, INC.$69.7K8.6%
    SAN JOSE, CA · 4 subawards
  5. MICHAEL KARI$58.9K7.3%
    VENTURA, CA · 2 subawards
  6. MATECO DRILLING CO$22K2.7%
    GRAND RAPIDS, MI · 1 subaward
  7. CLEAN AIR ENGINEERING INC$17.9K2.2%
    PALATINE, IL · 2 subawards
  8. IRONCLAD ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC$13.6K1.7%
    HOUSTON, TX · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $1.3M (3 subawards)

3 primes

  1. DAWSON SOLUTIONS, LLC$789.8K59%
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward
  2. MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$431.9K33%
    LEXINGTON, MA · 1 subaward
  3. DAWSON MCG, LLC$106.6K8.0%
    HONOLULU, HI · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 18% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $962.4K paid out · $13.4M received
  • FY2022: $2.4M paid out · $3.9M received
  • FY2023: $2.8M paid out · $4.1M received
  • FY2024: $5.4M paid out · $6.1M received
  • FY2025: $2.6M paid out · $796K received
  • FY2026: $809.3K paid out · $1.3M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

827 companies · $1B reported

  1. ARCHER WESTERN CONSTRUCTION LLC$92.7M
    TAMPA, FL · 5 subawards · Utility system construction
  2. SEVENSON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.$47.1M
    NIAGARA FALLS, NY · 63 subawards · Other heavy and civil engineering construction
  3. TANTARA ASSOCIATES CORP$40.3M
    WORCESTER, MA · 24 subawards · Other heavy and civil engineering construction

Primes that pay it

40 companies · $160.2M reported

  1. EA ENGINEERING, SCIENCE, AND TECHNOLOGY, INC., PBC$54M
    HUNT VALLEY, MD · 8 subawards · Remediation and other waste management services
  2. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION$32.1M
    RESTON, VA · 4 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. BAE SYSTEMS LAND & ARMAMENTS L.P.$17M
    YORK, PA · 20 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 45 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.$1.7B−40% in FY2026
    LOS ANGELES, CA · 123 entities · 61% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesEnvironmental Protection Agency · Remediation and other waste management services+11 more
  2. BURNS & MCDONNELL ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.$444.1M−65% in FY2026
    KANSAS CITY, MO · 3 entities · 22% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesState · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. FIDELITY TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, LLC$465.3M−5.7% in FY2026
    READING, PA · 2 entities · 22% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of CH2M HILL, INC (92 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Jacobs EngineeringAI match · 99%
  • Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.AI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$240K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$1.8M
$1.3M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$83K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$870K
    14 reports
  2. 2024$540K
    10 reports
  3. 2025$240K
    4 reports
  4. 2026$120K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Government issues12 reports
  2. Transportation12 reports
  3. Defense8 reports
  4. Aerospace6 reports
  5. Budget and appropriations6 reports
  6. Clean air and water6 reports
  7. Roads and highways6 reports
  8. Agriculture2 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES23 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE23 reports
  3. Executive Office of the President (EOP)12 reports
  4. Transportation - Dept of (DOT)9 reports
  5. Energy - Dept of6 reports
  6. Natl Aeronautics & Space Administration (NASA)6 reports
  7. Defense - Dept of (DOD)4 reports
  8. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)3 reports
  9. White House Office3 reports
  10. Overseas Private Investment Corp (OPIC)2 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP$770K
    14 reports
  2. BALLARD PARTNERS$180K
    4 reports
  3. Liebman & Associates, Inc.$0
    5 reports
  4. TGB STRATEGIES LLC$0
    1 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Democratic$47.5K57%
  2. Republican$35.5K43%

PACs sponsored

  • JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (JACOBS PAC)$361.9K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.