Federal contractor · LONG BEACH, CA

JETZERO, INC.

JETZERO, INC. received $5.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (+146% vs FY2025). Since FY2021: $14.4M. Its largest customer was Federal Aviation Administration ($5.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$5.3M
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
DESRHMAMGKU6
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 7MFY2021
  2. 2.2MFY2025
  3. 5.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$5.3M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Federal Aviation Administration· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Sep 24, 2026 – Sep 24, 2026· 693KA926T00012
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Los Angeles County, CA· Research & development· Nov 5, 2024 – May 11, 2026· 80GRC025CA006

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

JETZERO, INC. received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards), −100% vs FY2025.

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 8MFY2025

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2025.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $212.8K reported

  1. MELBOURNE, FL · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. AURORA INNOVATIONS, LLC$4.7M−34% in FY2026
    WASHINGTON, DC · 63% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Aviation Administration · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. PROTECTION ENGINEERS, L.L.C.$6.3M−15% in FY2026
    ALPHARETTA, GA · 71% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Aviation Administration · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. FORT HILL GROUP L.L.C.$4.6M+114% in FY2026
    WASHINGTON, DC · 62% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Aviation Administration · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Jet ZeroAI match · 100%
  • JETZEROAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$96K
17 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$456K
$196K in its own reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$60K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$200K
    8 reports
  3. 2025$96K
    17 reports
  4. 2026$100K
    6 reports

Top issues

  1. Aviation, aircraft and airlines17 reports
  2. Aerospace16 reports
  3. Defense8 reports
  4. Science and technology8 reports
  5. Environment and Superfund7 reports
  6. Transportation7 reports
  7. Energy and nuclear4 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES23 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE23 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Miller Strategies, LLC$250K
    5 reports
  2. BOUNDARY STONE PARTNERS$240K
    8 reports
  3. Ott Bielitzki & O'Neill PLLC$80K
    10 reports
  4. Trilogy Advisors LLC$0
    4 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: AI name judgments (entity-match@1, jev-1.13.0), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.