Federal contractor · SAN ANTONIO, TX

JOHNSON VENTURE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, INC.

JOHNSON VENTURE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, INC. received $575.4K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (−81% vs FY2025). Since FY2018: $24.2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($625.5K).

Obligations · FY2026
$575.4K
New awards
7
Sole-source
99.7%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
CCLDP2LPGKN4
Parent company
JOHNSON VENTURE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS INC.
Small businessWoman-ownedVeteran-ownedMinority-owned8(a) program

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 47.5KFY2018
  2. 209.3KFY2019
  3. 2.6MFY2020
  4. 3MFY2021
  5. 3.2MFY2022
  6. 3.1MFY2023
  7. 8.3MFY2024
  8. 3.1MFY2025
  9. 575.4KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 4 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$462.2K80%
  2. Facilities & utilities$63.1K11%
  3. Health & medical$50.2K8.7%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition99.7%
    US 39% · $573.8K
  • Sole-source awards99.7%
    US 30% · $573.8K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Hampton city, VA· Health & medical· May 29, 2020 – Dec 16, 2025· 80LARC20P0022
  2. Department of the Army· Richland County, SC· Professional services· Dec 22, 2020 – Dec 17, 2025· W9124J21C0004
  3. Department of the Air Force· Harrison County, MS· Health & medical· Sep 9, 2020 – Dec 17, 2025· FA301020C0026
  4. Department of the Army· Bexar County, TX· Health & medical· Sep 22, 2023 – May 13, 2026· W81K0023P0255
  5. Department of the Army· Richland County, SC· Professional services· Mar 12, 2026 – Apr 14, 2026· W9124J26CA005
  6. Department of the Army· Nueces County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Mar 27, 2025 – Apr 6, 2026· W9126G25PA002
  7. Transportation Security Administration· Bexar County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Dec 1, 2022 – Dec 1, 2025· 70T01023P7668N001

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $5.6M reported

  1. HOUSTON, TX · 1 subaward

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 10 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. POHAKU PACIFIC LLC$10.2M+44% in FY2026
    HONOLULU, HI · 50% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · General medical and surgical hospitalsArmy · Office administrative servicesDefense Health Agency · General medical and surgical hospitals
  2. SAN ANTONIO, TX · 40% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · General medical and surgical hospitals
  3. KAKO'O SERVICES LLC$18.6M−9.6% in FY2026
    HONOLULU, HI · 56% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · General medical and surgical hospitalsArmy · Offices of other health practitioners

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.