Federal contractor · SOUTHLAKE, TX

JSTOOGOOD LLC

JSTOOGOOD LLC received $4.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 12 awards (−65% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $98.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($1.6M).

Obligations · FY2026
$4.3M
New awards
12
Sole-source
49%
Single offer
34%
UEI
J7M9KNLGXKR4
Small businessWoman-ownedVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-owned8(a) program

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 229.8KFY2017
  2. 6.2MFY2018
  3. 5.9MFY2019
  4. 8.9MFY2020
  5. 12.1MFY2021
  6. 13.7MFY2022
  7. 17.1MFY2023
  8. 17.9MFY2024
  9. 12.2MFY2025
  10. 4.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 3 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 3 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. 1 awards
  7. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$2.4M56%
  2. Professional services$1.9M44%
  3. Research & development$5000.0%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition83%
    US 39% · $3.6M
  • Sole-source awards49%
    US 30% · $2.1M
  • Single-offer competitions34%
    US 8.7% · $1.4M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of State· Wichita County, TX· Professional services· Apr 3, 2023 – Dec 8, 2025· 19AQMM23C0053
  2. Department of State· Wichita County, TX· Professional services· Sep 19, 2024 – Aug 26, 2026· 19AQMM24C0098
  3. Department of the Navy· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Sep 28, 2022 – Apr 7, 2026· N0003022C4056
  4. Internal Revenue Service· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Feb 10, 2022 – Apr 17, 2026· 2032H522F00187
  5. Department of the Navy· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Dec 13, 2024 – Nov 25, 2025· N0003025C4002
  6. Federal Aviation Administration· Atlantic County, NJ· Professional services· Aug 16, 2023 – Jul 27, 2026· 692M1523F00165
  7. Department of the Air Force· Greene County, OH· Professional services· Mar 9, 2022 – Mar 10, 2026· FA239622F0152
  8. Department of the Air Force· El Paso County, CO· IT & telecom· Sep 23, 2025 – May 6, 2026· FA700025F0149

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $652.4K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $185K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $6.2M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $7M reported

  1. CHANTILLY, VA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  2. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 11 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 19 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. 1 SYNC TECHNOLOGIES, LLC$19.7M−34% in FY2026
    MONTGOMERY, AL · 29% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related servicesAir Force · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesNavy · Computer systems design and related services
  2. FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.$23.9M−95% in FY2026
    CAMBRIDGE, MA · 30% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related servicesState · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. OGIS COMMUNICATION GROUP INC$24.8M−36% in FY2026
    CINCINNATI, OH · 30% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related servicesNavy · Computer systems design and related servicesState · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.