Federal contractor · HUNTSVILLE, AL

RADIANCE TECHNOLOGIES INC

RADIANCE TECHNOLOGIES INC received $141.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 43 awards (−15% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $2B. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($75.6M).

Obligations · FY2026
$141.8M
New awards
43
Sole-source
36%
Single offer
19%
UEI
YXRLX5PDCWK4
Parent company
RADIANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $141.8M in FY2026 together.

  1. RADIANCE TECHNOLOGIES INCHUNTSVILLE, AL · Family page
    $141.8M
  2. $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 153.8MFY2017
  2. 160.5MFY2018
  3. 247.7MFY2019
  4. 181.4MFY2020
  5. 230.2MFY2021
  6. 229.7MFY2022
  7. 249.9MFY2023
  8. 203MFY2024
  9. 167.7MFY2025
  10. 141.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 26 awards
  2. 2 awards
  3. 13 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$77.5M55%
  2. Professional services$64.3M45%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition55%
    US 39% · $77.9M
  • Sole-source awards36%
    US 30% · $51.4M
  • Single-offer competitions19%
    US 8.8% · $26.5M
  • Urgency justifications1.2%
    US 5.1% · $1.7M

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Sep 30, 2020 – Jan 7, 2026· W50RAJ20F0014
  2. Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Oct 30, 2020 – Apr 29, 2026· W9113M21F0060
  3. Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Aug 3, 2022 – Jun 3, 2026· W9113M22FD002
  4. URIEL$65.8M
    Department of the Air Force· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Apr 19, 2023 – Apr 22, 2026· FA875023F1005
  5. Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Aug 23, 2019 – Nov 25, 2025· W9113M19FD003
  6. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Nov 26, 2024 – Apr 17, 2026· HR001125C0318
  7. Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Nov 22, 2021 – May 5, 2026· W50RAJ22F0002
  8. Defense Logistics Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Apr 10, 2026 – May 7, 2026· SPRRA226C0009

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $21.1M (52 subawards)

38 sub-recipients

  1. BEDFORD, MA · 2 subawards
  2. STERLING, VA · 2 subawards
  3. MCLEAN, VA · 2 subawards
  4. RESTON, VA · 1 subaward
  5. FAIRBORN, OH · 2 subawards
  6. GATEWAY GEOSPATIAL GROUP LLC$1.2M5.6%
    PROVIDENCE FORGE, VA · 4 subawards
  7. ASHBURN, VA · 3 subawards
  8. BLUE ASH, OH · 1 subaward
  9. PRINCETON, NJ · 1 subaward
  10. BEAVERCREEK, OH · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $1.9M (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. RESTON, VA · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 15% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $312.8M paid out · $24.6M received
  • FY2022: $107.3M paid out · $4M received
  • FY2023: $87.2M paid out · $38.2M received
  • FY2024: $87.7M paid out · $2.6M received
  • FY2025: $29.2M paid out · $12.8M received
  • FY2026: $21.1M paid out · $1.9M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

320 companies · $645M reported

  1. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 32 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. ALEXANDRIA, VA · 20 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 9 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

27 companies · $121.2M reported

  1. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 7 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. HOUSTON, TX · 8 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. CENTREVILLE, VA · 4 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. QED SYSTEMS, LLC$215.3M−39% in FY2026
    ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MD · 39% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services
  2. P E SYSTEMS, INC.$269.8M−45% in FY2026
    FAIRFAX, VA · 2 entities · 42% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  3. JOINT TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC$253M−45% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 39% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of RADIANCE TECHNOLOGIES INC (2 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • RADIANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.AI match · 100%
  • RADIANCE TCEHNOLOGIES, INCAI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$720K
20 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$2.1M
PAC giving · 2026
$47.5K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$464K
    12 reports
  2. 2024$560K
    12 reports
  3. 2025$720K
    20 reports
  4. 2026$310K
    8 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense50 reports
  2. Computer industry8 reports
  3. Homeland security4 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES50 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE47 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. MAYNOR & STIERS, LLC$840K
    12 reports
  2. VENN STRATEGIES$460K
    8 reports
  3. Adams and Reese, LLP$250K
    14 reports
  4. MCKINNON GROUP, LLC$240K
    7 reports
  5. Williams and Jensen, PLLC$200K
    6 reports
  6. Skipper Group$64K
    5 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$35K74%
  2. Democratic$12.5K26%

PACs sponsored

  • RADIANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$78.3K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.