Federal contractor · KAILUA, HI
KAIHONUA LLC
KAIHONUA LLC received $10M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (−32% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $217.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($9.9M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $10M
- New awards
- 7
- Sole-source
- 84%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- JKZ2DK3XBLQ2
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 24.4MFY2017
- 31MFY2018
- 23.3MFY2019
- 27.1MFY2020
- 20.7MFY2021
- 22.8MFY2022
- 22MFY2023
- 21.8MFY2024
- 14.7MFY2025
- 10MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Army$9.9M99%2 awards
- Department of the Navy$78.9K0.8%2 awards
- Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%1 awards
- Defense Health Agency$00.0%1 awards
- Defense Information Systems Agency-$5,1740.0%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- IT & telecom$9.9M99%
- Equipment maintenance$83.3K0.8%
- Research & development$5000.0%
Where the work was performed
- Coryell County, TX$8.4M84%
- Macomb County, MI$1.6M16%
- Honolulu County, HI$73.7K0.7%
- Madison County, AL$5000.0%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition84%US 39% · $8.4M
- Sole-source awards84%US 30% · $8.4M
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.8% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts
- Department of the Navy$78.9KDepartment of Defense · 1 awards
Largest awards
- Defense Health Agency· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Sep 21, 2021 – Jan 14, 2026· W81XWH21P0196
- Defense Information Systems Agency· Honolulu County, HI· Equipment maintenance· Jun 1, 2022 – Apr 7, 2026· HC101922C0003
- Department of the Navy· Honolulu County, HI· Equipment maintenance· Jun 4, 2026 – Jun 4, 2026· N6600126F8873
- ENGINEERING SERVICES$40.8KDepartment of the Navy· Honolulu County, HI· Professional services· Jul 10, 2019 – Dec 22, 2025· N6600119F0863
- Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 19, 2025 – Jun 4, 2026· HQ085926FG016
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
By fiscal year
- FY2021: $0 paid out · $86.4K received
- FY2023: $63.2K paid out · $11.9M received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
1 company · $63.2K reported
- JOHNSON SERVICE GROUP, INC.$63.2KWESTMONT, IL · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
Primes that pay it
3 companies · $12M reported
- KIHEI, HI · 2 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
- YORK, PA · 1 subaward · Other telecommunications
- VT MILCOM INC.$86.4KVIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- INTEGRATED SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC$43.3M−43% in FY2026KALISPELL, MT · 90% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
- LINTECH-PRAGMATICS JV LLC$43.5M−43% in FY2026RESTON, VA · 90% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
- STERLING, VA · 79% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.