Federal contractor · SPARTA, WI

KAIYUH SERVICES, LLC

KAIYUH SERVICES, LLC received $257K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−95% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $75M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($257K).

Obligations · FY2026
$257K
New awards
1
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
WLCKDZUL6HS7
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) programNative-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $1M in FY2026 together.

  1. KAIYUH SERVICES, LLCSPARTA, WI · Family page
    $257K
  2. KAIYUH SERVICES LLCMILAN, TN
    $768.4K

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 17.2MFY2017
  2. 4.6MFY2018
  3. 911.5KFY2019
  4. 7.2MFY2020
  5. 11.1MFY2021
  6. 13.6MFY2022
  7. 9.8MFY2023
  8. 5.2MFY2024
  9. 5.1MFY2025
  10. 257KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$257K100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$257K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Monroe County, WI$257K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $257K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $257K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. ROADS AND GROUNDS MAINTENANCE$21.7M
    Department of the Army· Monroe County, WI· Facilities & utilities· Aug 31, 2021 – Feb 17, 2026· W911SA21C3000

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $8.2M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2022: $260.3K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2023: $4.5M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

10 companies · $13M reported

  1. INGLETT & STUBBS INTERNATIONAL, LLC$4.5M
    ATLANTA, GA · 1 subaward · Utility system construction
  2. J. F. BRENNAN COMPANY, INC.$3.4M
    LA CROSSE, WI · 3 subawards · Other heavy and civil engineering construction
  3. FRIEDEN EXCAVATING$3.2M
    NEW BOSTON, IL · 2 subawards · Other heavy and civil engineering construction

Primes that pay it

1 company · $238.3K reported

  1. ENSIGN-BICKFORD AEROSPACE & DEFENSE COMPANY$238.3K
    SIMSBURY, CT · 5 subawards · Other chemical product and preparation manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. GULFSTREAM GOODWILL INDUSTRIES INC$10.2M−3.6% in FY2026
    WEST PALM BEACH, FL · 60% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Facilities support services
  2. GRAHAM SERVICES LLC$10M−7% in FY2026
    SMITHVILLE, TN · 60% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Facilities support services
  3. KIRA GOVERNMENT SERVICES LLC$10.9M−24% in FY2026
    LYNNWOOD, WA · 61% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Facilities support services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.