Federal contractor · ANCHORAGE, AK
KONIAG MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS LLC
KONIAG MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS LLC received $36.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 58 awards (−25% vs FY2025). Since FY2020: $579.8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($9.6M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $36.1M
- New awards
- 58
- Sole-source
- 93%
- Single offer
- 4.6%
- UEI
- ZZYLVTN9ZCQ8
Company family
Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.
2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $122.2M in FY2026 together.
- KONIAG MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS LLCANCHORAGE, AK · Family page$36.1M
- KONIAG DATA SOLUTIONS LLCANCHORAGE, AK$86.1M
AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 14.7MFY2020
- 71.7MFY2021
- 135.3MFY2022
- 145.3MFY2023
- 128.5MFY2024
- 48.2MFY2025
- 36.1MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Army$9.6M27%3 awards
- Federal Acquisition Service$8.3M23%4 awards
- Departmental Offices$6.2M17%2 awards
- Department of Education$5.7M16%5 awards
- U.S. Coast Guard$2.2M6.2%20 awards
- 2 awards
- Department of State$1.4M4.0%3 awards
- Office of the Secretary$860.1K2.4%3 awards
- Washington Headquarters Services$757.7K2.1%1 awards
- Department of the Air Force$629.7K1.7%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Professional services$23.6M64%
- IT & telecom$13M36%
Where the work was performed
- Anchorage Municipality, AK$13.2M36%
- Prince George County, VA$8.3M23%
- District of Columbia, DC$7.3M20%
- Arlington County, VA$4.2M12%
- Pasquotank County, NC$2.2M6.2%
- Harford County, MD$1.7M4.6%
- El Paso County, CO$629.7K1.7%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition98%US 39% · $35.3M
- Sole-source awards93%US 30% · $33.7M
- Single-offer competitions4.6%US 8.7% · $1.7M
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts
- Department of Education · 1 awards
- U.S. Coast Guard$2.2MDepartment of Homeland Security · 6 awards
Largest awards
- Department of State· Anchorage Municipality, AK· IT & telecom· Jul 23, 2021 – Apr 15, 2026· 19AQMM21C0118
- Departmental Offices· Alexandria city, VA· Professional services· Sep 3, 2020 – Feb 23, 2026· 140D0420C0101
- Department of the Army· Anchorage Municipality, AK· IT & telecom· Jan 23, 2023 – Jan 21, 2026· W91CRB23F0057
- OBO ASMB SUPPORT$23.4M
- Federal Acquisition Service· Prince George County, VA· Professional services· Sep 30, 2021 – Sep 25, 2026· 47QFDA21F0067
- Federal Acquisition Service· Prince George County, VA· Professional services· Sep 29, 2021 – Sep 22, 2026· 47QFDA21F0064
- Departmental Offices· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Jan 3, 2023 – Jul 15, 2026· 140D0423C0022
- Agency for International Development· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Sep 29, 2022 – Dec 10, 2025· 72MC1022C00013
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
1 company · $1.7M reported
- SALIENT CRGT, INC.$1.7MFAIRFAX, VA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 37 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- GREAT HILL SOLUTIONS, LLC$477.1M−43% in FY2026CHANTILLY, VA · 35% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveState · Computer systems design and related servicesDepartmental Offices · Computer systems design and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services+7 more
- FEDERAL RESOURCES CORPORATION$223.3M+7.9% in FY2026ERIE, PA · 23% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveState · Computer systems design and related servicesAir Force · Computer systems design and related servicesNavy · Computer systems design and related services+2 more
- BOWHEAD MISSION SOLUTIONS, LLC$433M−52% in FY2026SPRINGFIELD, VA · 12 entities · 28% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services+3 more
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.