Federal contractor · HAGERSTOWN, MD

KR-MTAC LLC

KR-MTAC LLC received $45.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 9 awards (+14% vs FY2025). Since FY2022: $140.9M. Its largest customer was Office of Procurement Operations ($45.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$45.3M
New awards
9
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
ENKUFZYYKJG5
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 0FY2022
  2. 18.5MFY2023
  3. 37.4MFY2024
  4. 39.7MFY2025
  5. 45.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 9 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$45.3M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Office of Procurement Operations· Prince George's County, MD· Facilities & utilities· Sep 30, 2025 – Sep 21, 2026· 70RFP225FREC00062
  2. Office of Procurement Operations· Alexandria city, VA· Facilities & utilities· Sep 30, 2025 – Sep 22, 2026· 70RFP225FREC00051
  3. Office of Procurement Operations· Loudoun County, VA· Facilities & utilities· Sep 30, 2025 – Sep 28, 2026· 70RFP225FREC00059
  4. Office of Procurement Operations· District of Columbia, DC· Facilities & utilities· Dec 12, 2024 – Dec 10, 2025· 70RFP225FREC00001
  5. Office of Procurement Operations· District of Columbia, DC· Facilities & utilities· Oct 30, 2025 – Aug 26, 2026· 70RFP226FREC00001
  6. Office of Procurement Operations· District of Columbia, DC· Facilities & utilities· Jun 1, 2026 – Sep 1, 2026· 70RFP226FREC00019
  7. Office of Procurement Operations· Alexandria city, VA· Facilities & utilities· Sep 25, 2026 – Sep 25, 2026· 70RFP226FREC00035
  8. Office of Procurement Operations· Pulaski County, AR· Facilities & utilities· Jun 18, 2026 – Jun 18, 2026· 70RFP426FRE700019

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. GOLDEN SVCS, LLC$138.2M+85% in FY2026
    KINGSTON, TN · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of Procurement Operations · Investigation and security services
  2. CDA INCORPORATED$89M−88% in FY2026
    ANNAPOLIS, MD · 73% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of Procurement Operations · Investigation and security services
  3. SIMMONS & GOLDEN SECURITY LLC$128.6M+17% in FY2026
    MARYVILLE, TN · 84% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of Procurement Operations · Investigation and security services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.