Federal contractor · STRATFORD, CT
KUB TECHNOLOGIES INC.
KUB TECHNOLOGIES INC. received $755.5K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (+220% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $3.4M. Its largest customer was Department of Veterans Affairs ($364.5K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $755.5K
- New awards
- 6
- Sole-source
- 100%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- HMZFSQFS5XK9
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 226.9KFY2017
- 327.5KFY2018
- 284KFY2019
- 16KFY2020
- 57.5KFY2021
- 669.3KFY2022
- 372.4KFY2023
- 483.8KFY2024
- 236.3KFY2025
- 755.5KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of Veterans Affairs$364.5K48%3 awards
- Forest Service$191.5K25%1 awards
- Food Safety and Inspection Service$183.5K24%1 awards
- Defense Health Agency$16K2.1%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Health & medical$556K74%
- Other equipment & supplies$183.5K24%
- Equipment maintenance$16K2.1%
Where the work was performed
- Twiggs County, GA$191.5K25%
- Onslow County, NC$16K2.1%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition100%US 39% · $755.5K
- Sole-source awards100%US 30% · $755.5K
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.8% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts
- Department of Veterans Affairs · 2 awards
- Forest Service$191.5KDepartment of Agriculture · 1 awards
- Department of Agriculture · 1 awards
Largest awards
- Department of Veterans Affairs· Greater Bridgeport Planning Region, CT· Health & medical· Aug 18, 2026 – Aug 18, 2026· 36C24726P0777
- Food Safety and Inspection Service· Greater Bridgeport Planning Region, CT· Other equipment & supplies· Aug 14, 2026 – Aug 14, 2026· 123A9426P0025
- PICASSO PLUS 2D SPECIMEN$169.5KDepartment of Veterans Affairs· Greater Bridgeport Planning Region, CT· Health & medical· May 5, 2026 – May 5, 2026· 36C25026P0667
- Defense Health Agency· Onslow County, NC· Equipment maintenance· Jan 11, 2023 – Jun 2, 2026· HT940623P0037
- Department of Veterans Affairs· Rutherford County, TN· Equipment maintenance· Dec 14, 2023 – Sep 29, 2026· 36C24924P0112
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
1 company · $83K reported
- FORT WORTH, TX · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- OROBOROS INSTRUMENTS GMBH$541.9K−81% in FY2026INNSBRUCK, AUT · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
- SS/X NORTH AMERICA INC.$586.6KLAFAYETTE, CO · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
- BECKLAR LLC$598.8KOGDEN, UT · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.