Federal contractor · HATFIELD, PA

LABORATORY TESTING, LLC

LABORATORY TESTING, LLC received $867.7K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (+17% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $5.7M. Its largest customer was National Institute of Standards and Technology ($775.9K).

Obligations · FY2026
$867.7K
New awards
3
Sole-source
11%
Single offer
89%
UEI
WVERJSJEZ4U8
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 253.2KFY2017
  2. 537.4KFY2018
  3. 314.3KFY2019
  4. 680.9KFY2020
  5. 49.6KFY2021
  6. 691.8KFY2022
  7. 802.9KFY2023
  8. 804.6KFY2024
  9. 741.2KFY2025
  10. 867.7KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$783K90%
  2. IT & telecom$84.6K9.8%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $867.7K
  • Sole-source awards11%
    US 30% · $91.8K
  • Single-offer competitions89%
    US 8.8% · $775.9K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. National Institute of Standards and Technology· Montgomery County, PA· Other equipment & supplies· Apr 29, 2026 – Apr 29, 2026· 1333ND26FNB640041
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Montgomery County, PA· IT & telecom· May 29, 2026 – May 29, 2026· 80NSSC26P0717
  3. Department of the Navy· District of Columbia, DC· Other equipment & supplies· Feb 10, 2026 – Feb 10, 2026· N0017326P5408

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $448K (5 subawards)

3 primes

  1. FORT WORTH, TX · 1 subaward
  2. KANSAS CITY, MO · 3 subawards
  3. GREENVILLE, SC · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $180.4K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $455.6K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $348.3K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $247.1K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $1.8M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $448K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

5 companies · $3.5M reported

  1. FORT WORTH, TX · 11 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 18 subawards · Facilities support services
  3. GROTON, CT · 4 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. JWF DEFENSE SYSTEMS, LLC$2M+88% in FY2026
    JOHNSTOWN, PA · 84% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institute of Standards and Technology · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing
  2. DWIGHT SHEARER$409.5K+2.2% in FY2026
    LATROBE, PA · 17% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institute of Standards and Technology · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing
  3. SALT LAKE CITY, UT · 8.8% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institute of Standards and Technology · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.