Federal contractor · MANCELONA, MI

LANZEN INC

LANZEN INC received $62.4K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (+28% vs FY2025). Since FY2023: $340.3K. Its largest customer was Defense Logistics Agency ($62.4K).

Obligations · FY2026
$62.4K
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
UHMRJMCXJHN8
Parent company
LANZEN, INCORPORATED
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the LANZEN, INCORPORATED company family: 2 registered entities, $3M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. LANZEN, INCORPORATEDBRUCE TWP, MI · Family page
    $2.9M

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 97.8KFY2023
  2. 131.4KFY2024
  3. 48.8KFY2025
  4. 62.4KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Defense Logistics Agency$62.4K100%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$62.4K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Macomb County, MI$62.4K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. 8511974078!PANEL,INTERIOR,VEHI$27.8K
    Defense Logistics Agency· Macomb County, MI· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Mar 12, 2026 – Mar 12, 2026· SPE7L126F4817
  2. 8512064777!PANEL,INTERIOR,VEHI$17.8K
    Defense Logistics Agency· Macomb County, MI· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Apr 23, 2026 – Apr 23, 2026· SPE7L126F6946
  3. 8511741994!PANEL,INTERIOR,VEHI$16.8K
    Defense Logistics Agency· Macomb County, MI· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Nov 6, 2025 – Nov 6, 2025· SPE7L126F1158

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

7 companies · $208.3M reported

  1. BAE SYSTEMS LAND & ARMAMENTS L.P.$187.3M
    YORK, PA · 772 subawards · Other transportation equipment manufacturing
  2. ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION$12M
    GROTON, CT · 123 subawards · Other transportation equipment manufacturing
  3. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$5.5M
    FORT WORTH, TX · 75 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 18 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. EQUIPMENT PARTS SALES$9.8M−25% in FY2026
    HALIFAX, PA · 74% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Motor vehicle parts manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Other fabricated metal product manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Hardware manufacturing+7 more
  2. MACOMB SHEET METAL INC$10.5M−23% in FY2026
    CLINTON TOWNSHIP, MI · 75% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Motor vehicle parts manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Other fabricated metal product manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Hardware manufacturing+7 more
  3. GREENE METAL PRODUCTS, INC.$11.8M−73% in FY2026
    CLINTON TOWNSHIP, MI · 72% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Motor vehicle parts manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Other fabricated metal product manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Hardware manufacturing+7 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.