Federal contractor · MCLEAN, VA
LINK SOLUTIONS INC
LINK SOLUTIONS INC received $8.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (−43% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $93.7M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($8.9M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $8.9M
- New awards
- 7
- Sole-source
- 1.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- ZK7FKADLN8H8
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 25MFY2017
- 19.5MFY2018
- 8.4MFY2019
- 5.2MFY2020
- 5.2MFY2021
- 983.1KFY2022
- 2.2MFY2023
- 2.8MFY2024
- 15.6MFY2025
- 8.9MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Army$8.9M100%6 awards
- Defense Health Agency$00.0%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- IT & telecom$8.9M100%
Where the work was performed
- Liberty County, GA$5.1M57%
- Harrison County, WV$1.6M18%
- Prince George's County, MD$1.5M16%
- Leavenworth County, KS$599.8K6.8%
- Harford County, MD$90.7K1.0%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition1.0%US 39% · $90.7K
- Sole-source awards1.0%US 30% · $90.7K
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.8% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of the Army· Harrison County, WV· IT & telecom· Jul 24, 2025 – Jun 8, 2026· W91RUS25FA111
- Department of the Army· Liberty County, GA· IT & telecom· Sep 23, 2024 – May 29, 2026· W91RUS24F0293
- Department of the Army· Prince George's County, MD· IT & telecom· May 13, 2025 – Jun 2, 2026· W911QX25F0053
- Department of the Army· Liberty County, GA· IT & telecom· Mar 11, 2025 – May 28, 2026· W91RUS25FA029
- Department of the Army· Leavenworth County, KS· IT & telecom· Sep 11, 2024 – Apr 14, 2026· W91QF424F0311
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
By fiscal year
- FY2021: $0 paid out · $387.8K received
- FY2022: $0 paid out · $5.6M received
- FY2023: $603.5K paid out · $0 received
- FY2025: $644.8K paid out · $0 received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
4 companies · $1.2M reported
- GCYBER LLC$466.3KVIENNA, VA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
- WAKEFIELD, MA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
- BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC$239.4KSAINT LOUIS, MO · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
Primes that pay it
2 companies · $6M reported
- KIHEI, HI · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
- ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION$387.8KGROTON, CT · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- B&T TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, G.P.$20.1M−92% in FY2026HUNTSVILLE, AL · 74% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
- SPIDER STRATEGIES, INC.$26.6M−23% in FY2026ARLINGTON, VA · 81% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
- BEAT-ATC LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY$26.6M+13% in FY2026SAN ANTONIO, TX · 81% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.