Federal contractor · TEMPE, AZ

LOGAN SIMPSON DESIGN INC.

LOGAN SIMPSON DESIGN INC. received $520.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 19 awards (−63% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $28.4M. Its largest customer was Bureau of Reclamation ($215.4K).

Obligations · FY2026
$520.2K
New awards
19
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
39%
UEI
REB3J4JAMTE5
Parent company
LOGAN SIMPSON DESIGN INC.
Small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $520.2K in FY2026 together.

  1. LOGAN SIMPSON DESIGN INC.TEMPE, AZ · Family page
    $520.2K
  2. LOGAN SIMPSON DESIGN INC.SALT LAKE CITY, UT
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 5.5MFY2017
  2. 6.2MFY2018
  3. 1MFY2019
  4. 167.7KFY2020
  5. 708.2KFY2021
  6. 2MFY2022
  7. 4MFY2023
  8. 7MFY2024
  9. 1.4MFY2025
  10. 520.2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 13 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$318.4K61%
  2. Professional services$201.8K39%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition39%
    US 39% · $203.8K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions39%
    US 8.8% · $203.8K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Bureau of Reclamation· San Juan County, NM· Professional services· Jan 19, 2024 – Jun 17, 2026· 140R4024C0003
  2. Bureau of Land Management· Mohave County, AZ· Professional services· Sep 19, 2022 – May 28, 2026· 140L2622P0075
  3. Forest Service· Coconino County, AZ· Professional services· Aug 7, 2023 – Dec 11, 2025· 12363N23F4248
  4. Bureau of Land Management· Anchorage Municipality, AK· Facilities & utilities· Sep 23, 2024 – May 26, 2026· 140L6324F0007
  5. Bureau of Reclamation· Maricopa County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· Apr 5, 2024 – Jul 10, 2026· 140R3024C0005
  6. Bureau of Land Management· Beaver County, UT· Professional services· Dec 23, 2024 – Jan 23, 2026· 140L5725F0004
  7. Bureau of Land Management· Lincoln County, NV· Professional services· May 19, 2023 – Mar 30, 2026· 140L3923P0001
  8. Bureau of Land Management· Rio Grande County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Jan 14, 2025 – Sep 21, 2026· 140L1725F0004

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

LOGAN SIMPSON DESIGN INC. received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 42.2KFY2024

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2024.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: -$68.8K (2 subawards)

1 prime

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $84.2K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $207.3K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $210.6K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $392.7K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · -$68.8K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $825.9K reported

  1. OKLAHOMA CITY, OK · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. CENTREVILLE, VA · 2 subawards · Remediation and other waste management services
  3. CHANTILLY, VA · 10 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 10 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SWCA, INCORPORATED$6.6M−6.6% in FY2026
    PHOENIX, AZ · 8 entities · 57% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesBureau of Reclamation · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesNational Park Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services+1 more
  2. ABR, INC.$5M−15% in FY2026
    FAIRBANKS, AK · 49% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesForest Service · Support activities for forestryNational Park Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. PALEOWEST LLC$9.7M−82% in FY2026
    PHOENIX, AZ · 58% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesForest Service · Support activities for forestryNational Park Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services+1 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.