Federal contractor · BATON ROUGE, LA

LOUISIANA BOARD OF REGENTS

No contract obligations recorded for LOUISIANA BOARD OF REGENTS in FY2026. Since FY2017: $800.2K. It also received $1.1M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
F3GJXVP1L166
Other than small businessGovernment entity

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

5 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $0 in FY2026 together.

  1. LOUISIANA BOARD OF REGENTSBATON ROUGE, LA · Family page
    $0
  2. $0
  3. $0
  4. $0
  5. $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 97.5KFY2017
  2. 265.2KFY2018
  3. 132.1KFY2019
  4. 32.5KFY2020
  5. 49.1KFY2021
  6. 73.1KFY2022
  7. 75.3KFY2023
  8. 75.4KFY2024

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for LOUISIANA BOARD OF REGENTS in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

LOUISIANA BOARD OF REGENTS received $1.1M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 19 actions (3 new awards), −84% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 47.083 · Integrative Activities ($700K).

Assistance · FY2026
$1.1M
New awards
3
Actions
19
Since FY2021
$47.2M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 15.2MFY2021
  2. 261.7KFY2022
  3. 14.6MFY2023
  4. 9.5MFY2024
  5. 6.5MFY2025
  6. 1.1MFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$1.1M100%

Top programs

  1. 47.083 · Integrative Activities$700K67%
  2. 47.050 · Geosciences$291.4K28%
  3. 43.016 · Established Program to Stimulate Competitive Research$200K19%
  4. 45.312 · National Leadership Grants-$1,5000.0%
  5. 43.008 · Office of Stem Engagement (OSTEM)-$11.9K0.0%
  6. 84.116 · Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education-$17.3K0.0%
  7. 84.215 · Innovative Approaches to Literacy; Promise Neighborhoods; Full-Service Community Schools; and Congressionally Directed Spending for Elementary and Secondary Education Community Projects-$108.5K0.0%

Largest awards

  1. 47.083 · Integrative Activities· National Science Foundation· Cooperative agreement· Aug 20, 2021 – Jun 1, 2026· 1946231
  2. 47.050 · Geosciences· National Science Foundation· Cooperative agreement· Jul 13, 2021 – Dec 11, 2025· 1827654
  3. 84.116 · Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education· Department of Education· Project grant· Dec 29, 2020 – Feb 10, 2026· P116T200031
  4. 43.016 · Established Program to Stimulate Competitive Research· National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Cooperative agreement· Jul 15, 2025 – May 21, 2026· 80NSSC25M0003
  5. 43.016 · Established Program to Stimulate Competitive Research· National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Cooperative agreement· Jan 10, 2022 – Jul 26, 2026· 80NSSC22M0030
  6. 84.215 · Innovative Approaches to Literacy; Promise Neighborhoods; Full-Service Community Schools; and Congressionally Directed Spending for Elementary and Secondary Education Community Projects· Department of Education· Project grant· Aug 17, 2023 – Jan 23, 2026· S215K230090

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $1M (9 subawards)

4 sub-recipients

  1. BATON ROUGE, LA · 4 subawards
  2. RUSTON, LA · 3 subawards
  3. LAFAYETTE, LA · 1 subaward
  4. NEW ORLEANS, LA · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $1.6M paid out · $344.7K received
  • FY2022: $1.5M paid out · $975.5K received
  • FY2023: $269.1K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $925.4K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $866.3K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2026: $1M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

18 companies · $21.5M reported

  1. GAINESVILLE, FL · 2 subawards
  2. SHREVEPORT, LA · 25 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. RUSTON, LA · 16 subawards

Primes that pay it

27 companies · $22.6M reported

  1. NEW ORLEANS, LA · 21 subawards
  2. SHREVEPORT, LA · 20 subawards
  3. EVANSTON, IL · 7 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MONTANA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY$83.6K−100% in FY2026
    BUTTE, MT · 99.5% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Colleges, universities, and professional schools
  2. TARTU, EST · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Colleges, universities, and professional schools
  3. SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY$50K−100% in FY2026
    BOSTON, MA · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Colleges, universities, and professional schools

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.