Federal contractor · FAIRFAX, VA

LS TECHNOLOGIES LLC

LS TECHNOLOGIES LLC received $64.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 48 awards (−22% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1B. Its largest customer was Federal Aviation Administration ($64.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$64.9M
New awards
48
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
23%
UEI
K97DGB4NAKJ5
Parent company
TETRA TECH, INC.
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the TETRA TECH, INC. company family: 81 registered entities, $387.5M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. TETRA TECH, INC.PASADENA, CA · Family page
    $90.5M
  2. $60.2M
  3. $22.9M
  4. TETRA TECH, INC.CHICAGO, IL
    $18.4M
  5. TETRA TECH, INC.OAKLAND, CA
    $16.7M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · jev-1.13.0 · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 66.1MFY2017
  2. 75.6MFY2018
  3. 106.3MFY2019
  4. 106.1MFY2020
  5. 134MFY2021
  6. 139.7MFY2022
  7. 127MFY2023
  8. 101.8MFY2024
  9. 83.5MFY2025
  10. 64.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 48 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$64.9M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition23%
    US 39% · $15M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions23%
    US 8.8% · $15M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Federal Aviation Administration· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Aug 19, 2021 – Sep 11, 2026· 693KA821F00282
  2. Federal Aviation Administration· Atlantic County, NJ· Professional services· May 2, 2019 – Sep 23, 2026· 692M1519F00263
  3. Federal Aviation Administration· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· May 23, 2017 – Jul 13, 2026· 0011
  4. Federal Aviation Administration· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Apr 6, 2017 – Aug 20, 2026· 0005
  5. Federal Aviation Administration· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Apr 13, 2018 – Aug 20, 2026· 693KA818F00128
  6. Federal Aviation Administration· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Apr 13, 2017 – Sep 21, 2026· 0009
  7. Federal Aviation Administration· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Apr 5, 2017 – Aug 20, 2026· 0008
  8. Federal Aviation Administration· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Mar 31, 2017 – Jul 21, 2026· 0004

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $8.7M (16 subawards)

13 sub-recipients

  1. OAKTON, VA · 1 subaward
  2. FALLS CHURCH, VA · 1 subaward
  3. CREATIVE WX SOLUTIONS LLC$1.5M17%
    MILLS RIVER, NC · 3 subawards
  4. EYRIE NETWORKS LLC$358.4K4.1%
    GERMANTOWN, MD · 1 subaward
  5. MORNING MOON CONSULTING SERVICES, LLC$309.1K3.6%
    POWHATAN, VA · 1 subaward
  6. GARLAND SYSTEMS ENTERPRISES, LLC$308.2K3.5%
    EGG HARBOR TOWNSHIP, NJ · 1 subaward
  7. SILVER MAPLE LLC$252.7K2.9%
    BRENTWOOD, TN · 2 subawards
  8. NORTHFIELD, NJ · 1 subaward
  9. MICROTHEORY LLC$238.9K2.8%
    KENSINGTON, MD · 1 subaward
  10. ARLINGTON, VA · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $107.6K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. NOBLIS, INC.$107.6K100%
    RESTON, VA · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 13% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $101.9M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2022: $62.8M paid out · $1.7M received
  • FY2023: $9.5M paid out · $16.9M received
  • FY2024: $26.7M paid out · $3.2M received
  • FY2025: $6M paid out · $1.4M received
  • FY2026: $8.7M paid out · $107.6K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

771 companies · $643.2M reported

  1. CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ARLINGTON, VA · 4 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. OAKTON, VA · 4 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

100 companies · $442.3M reported

  1. RESTON, VA · 27 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. ANCHORAGE, AK · 20 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. ANCHORAGE, AK · 8 subawards · Other professional, scientific, and technical services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 82 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. DAI GLOBAL LLC$741.8M−101% in FY2026
    BETHESDA, MD · 2 entities · 23% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAgency for International Development · Other professional, scientific, and technical servicesAgency for International Development · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesAgency for International Development · Architectural, engineering, and related services+2 more
  2. AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.$1.7B−40% in FY2026
    LOS ANGELES, CA · 74 entities · 26% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Remediation and other waste management servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services+7 more
  3. ENGLEWOOD, CO · 57 entities · 18% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services+3 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of TETRA TECH, INC. (81 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Tetra TechAI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2024
$200K
8 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$463.5K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$250K
    8 reports
  2. 2024$200K
    8 reports
  3. 2026$13.5K
    1 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense9 reports
  2. Agriculture1 reports
  3. Budget and appropriations1 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES2 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE1 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. The Roosevelt Group$440K
    8 reports
  2. CLEARWATER GROUP, LLC$13.5K
    1 reports
  3. Kelley Drye & Warren LLP$10K
    8 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: AI name judgments (entity-match@1, jev-1.13.0), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.