Federal contractor · OAKTON, VA

SYSNET TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

SYSNET TECHNOLOGIES, INC. received $19.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (+3.7% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $110.2M. Its largest customer was Federal Aviation Administration ($17.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$19.3M
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
GGRZH212W9J9
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 6.9MFY2017
  2. 5.7MFY2018
  3. 8.6MFY2019
  4. 6.6MFY2020
  5. 9.4MFY2021
  6. 8MFY2022
  7. 12.9MFY2023
  8. 14.2MFY2024
  9. 18.6MFY2025
  10. 19.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Federal Aviation Administration$17.2M89%
    2 awards
  2. Department of the Air Force$2.1M11%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$17.6M91%
  2. Professional services$1.7M8.7%

Where the work was performed

  1. Fairfax County, VA$17.2M89%
  2. St. Clair County, IL$2.1M11%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. THE SUSTAINMENT OF INDEPENDENCE RISK ASSESSMENT CAPABILITIES, INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY (ISS) ASSURANCE AND THE PERFORMANCE OF PENETRATION TESTING$57.9M
    Federal Aviation Administration· Fairfax County, VA· IT & telecom· Jul 15, 2021 – Aug 26, 2026· 693KA821C00012
  2. NEW TASK ORDER - NAS CYBER OPERATIONS$12.1M
    Federal Aviation Administration· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Sep 9, 2021 – Aug 11, 2026· 693KA921F00277
  3. ENTERPRISE SECURITY SERVICES (ESS)$8M
    Department of the Air Force· St. Clair County, IL· IT & telecom· Aug 12, 2024 – May 20, 2026· FA231824FB008

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $2.9M (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. LS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC$2.9M100%
    FAIRFAX, VA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $13.7M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $1.2M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $73.9K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $2.9M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $17.9M reported

  1. TETRA TECH, INC.$17.8M
    PASADENA, CA · 4 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. APPLIED INSIGHT, LLC$73.9K
    RESTON, VA · 1 subaward · Wired telecommunications carriers

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ADACEL SYSTEMS, INC.$55.4M−29% in FY2026
    ORLANDO, FL · 2 entities · 89% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Aviation Administration · Computer systems design and related servicesAir Force · Computer systems design and related services
  2. QUECON, INC.$57M+50% in FY2026
    FRONT ROYAL, VA · 74% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Aviation Administration · Computer systems design and related services
  3. AIR SPACE INTELLIGENCE, INC$23.3M
    BOSTON, MA · 45% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Aviation Administration · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.