Federal contractor · ALBUQUERQUE, NM

LUNATEK, LLC

LUNATEK, LLC received $1.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−44% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $16.4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($906.1K).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.6M
New awards
4
Sole-source
45%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
GJ7EBCC4A6A8
Parent company
LUNATEK LLC
Small businessWoman-ownedVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-owned8(a) programHUBZone firm

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 159.1KFY2017
  2. 23KFY2019
  3. 1.7MFY2020
  4. 1.6MFY2021
  5. 2.3MFY2022
  6. 2.4MFY2023
  7. 3.7MFY2024
  8. 2.9MFY2025
  9. 1.6MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$1.6M99.8%
  2. IT & telecom$2,8250.2%
  3. Research & development$5000.0%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition45%
    US 39% · $727.8K
  • Sole-source awards45%
    US 30% · $727.8K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Bureau of the Fiscal Service· Bernalillo County, NM· IT & telecom· Sep 15, 2023 – Jul 10, 2026· 20341123C00001
  2. Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Professional services· Apr 3, 2025 – Mar 19, 2026· N0024425P0123
  3. Defense Threat Reduction Agency· Bernalillo County, NM· Professional services· May 1, 2025 – Dec 8, 2025· HDTRA225CE005
  4. Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 5, 2025 – Jun 9, 2026· HQ085926FE864

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $414.7K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. KANSAS CITY, MO · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $12.9M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $1M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $597.8K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $3.3M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $1.8M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $414.7K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

5 companies · $20M reported

  1. RESTON, VA · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 5 subawards · Facilities support services
  3. COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 2 subawards · NAICS 5178

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES SDVOSB LLC$1.8M−100% in FY2026
    INDIANAPOLIS, IN · 22% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. SJ TECH LLC$8.2M−65% in FY2026
    SUGAR HILL, GA · 35% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of the Fiscal Service · Computer systems design and related services
  3. MSB ANALYTICS, INC.$1.8M−108% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 22% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.