Federal contractor · CAMPBELL, CA

LYNX SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES INC.

LYNX SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES INC. received $364.7K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−45% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $4.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($315.3K).

Obligations · FY2026: $364.7K
New awards: 4
Sole-source: 100%
Single offer: 0.0%

UEI: EWCXW1KUGKV4

Other than small business

Open in the contracts explorer Relationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

202.1KFY2017
149.2KFY2018
331KFY2019
203.9KFY2020
348.6KFY2021
445.6KFY2022
654.4KFY2023
937.7KFY2024
657.8KFY2025
364.7KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

Department of the Navy$315.3K86%
3 awards
Department of the Air Force$49.4K14%
1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

IT & telecom$315.3K86%
Research & development$49.4K14%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Low competition100%
US 39% · $364.7K
Sole-source awards100%
US 30% · $364.7K
Single-offer competitions0.0%
US 8.8% · $0
Urgency justifications0.0%
US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

Department of the Navy$315.3K
Department of Defense · 2 awards
Department of the Air Force$49.4K
Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

THE REQUIRED LYNX MOSA.IC, MODULAR OPEN SYSTEMS APPROACH, SUBSCRIPTION PROVIDES REMOTE LIVE SUPPORT, UPDATES, AND UPGRADES, FOR LYNX AVIONIC SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK.$278.3K
Department of the Navy· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· May 20, 2026 – May 20, 2026· N0017326P2431
THE REQUIRED LYNX MOSA.IC, MODULAR OPEN SYSTEMS APPROACH, SUBSCRIPTION PROVIDES REMOTE LIVE SUPPORT, UPDATES, AND UPGRADES, FOR LYNX AVIONIC SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK.$262.5K
Department of the Navy· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Jul 31, 2025 – Oct 28, 2025· N0017325P2454
NEW SOFTWARE MANUFACTURED BY LYNX SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES FOR DEVELOPING AND SUSTAINING THEIR COMBAT RESCUE HELICOPTER HH60W EMBEDDED TERRAIN AWARENESS WARNING SYSTEM ETAWS$49.4K
Department of the Air Force· Houston County, GA· Research & development· Apr 23, 2026 – May 14, 2026· FA857926P0023
THE SOFTWARE LYNXOS IS CURRENTLY BEING USED BY THE ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER (OEM), LOCKHEED MARTIN. LYNXOS V7.0.0 AND V7.3.1 REAL-TIME OPERATING SYSTEM (RTOS) ARE CURRENTLY BEING USED FOR THE NEWER RELEASES OF THE MH-60R/S SOFTWARE.$37K
Department of the Navy· Santa Clara County, CA· IT & telecom· Apr 30, 2026 – Apr 30, 2026· N6852026P1019

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

Sub-contracts: $2.9M (5 subawards)

4 primes

BELL TEXTRON INC$2.1M72%
FORT WORTH, TX · 2 subawards
SIERRA NEVADA CORPORATION$541.9K18%
SPARKS, NV · 1 subaward
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$203.4K6.9%
MELBOURNE, FL · 1 subaward
RAYTHEON COMPANY$75.2K2.6%
ANDOVER, MA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

FY2021: $0 paid out · $6.1M received
FY2022: $0 paid out · $12.6M received
FY2023: $0 paid out · $3.3M received
FY2024: $0 paid out · $3.9M received
FY2025: $0 paid out · $4.1M received
FY2026: $0 paid out · $2.9M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

11 companies · $33M reported

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$23.8M
FORT WORTH, TX · 44 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
BELL TEXTRON INC$5.2M
FORT WORTH, TX · 7 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
BAE SYSTEMS LAND & ARMAMENTS L.P.$948.3K
YORK, PA · 10 subawards · Other transportation equipment manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

EMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC.$1.1M−5% in FY2026
ROCHESTER, NY · 50% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Software publishersNavy · Computer systems design and related services
AMPLIFY SOLUTIONS LLC$901K+180,000% in FY2026
POTOMAC FALLS, VA · 46% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Computer systems design and related services
CYBERSPATIAL INC$935.1K+151% in FY2026
ARLINGTON, VA · 46% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Computer systems design and related servicesNavy · Software publishersAir Force · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

Lynx Software TechnologiesAI match · 100%

Lobbying · 2025: $240K; 4 reports
Lobbying · 2024–2026: $500K

Lobbying by year

2024$200K
4 reports
2025$240K
4 reports
2026$60K
2 reports

Top issues

Defense7 reports

Who was contacted

U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES7 reports
U.S. SENATE3 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

J.A. Green and Company (formerly LLC)$500K
10 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Congress: members and bills

Through the organizations matched to this company: members of Congress whose campaigns received contributions from their PACs, and the bills their lobbying reports named. Shown beside the company's contracts as a comparison, not a cause.

Bills named in its lobbying reports

H.R. 8070 · Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 20252 reports
118th Congress · Passed one chamber · 2024
H.R. 3838 · Streamlining Procurement for Effective Execution and Delivery and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 20262 reports
119th Congress · Passed one chamber · 2025
S. 2296 · National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 20262 reports
119th Congress · Passed one chamber · 2025
H.R. 8774 · Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 20251 report
118th Congress · Passed one chamber · 2024
S. 4921 · Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 20251 report
118th Congress · Reported by committee · 2024

5 of 10 reports (2024–2026) name at least one bill. Bills and resolutions the current reports name in their issue descriptions, by number of reports. A report names what it lobbied on, not which side it took.

Amounts, members and bills are as recorded, shown side by side. They say nothing about why a contribution was made, how a member voted or what a report sought. A bill number written in a report is read as the measure of the Congress its context points to (a law's number, the Congress written next to it, the title), else of the Congress then sitting.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.