Federal contractor · SAN ANTONIO, TX

M2 TECHNOLOGY, INC.

M2 TECHNOLOGY, INC. received $16.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 23 awards (−57% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $405.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($9.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$16.8M
New awards
23
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
69%
UEI
G2MAQCKH5DR1
Small businessVeteran-ownedMinority-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 49.9MFY2017
  2. 73.8MFY2018
  3. 61.9MFY2019
  4. 45.6MFY2020
  5. 29.1MFY2021
  6. 41.6MFY2022
  7. 31.3MFY2023
  8. 17.1MFY2024
  9. 38.8MFY2025
  10. 16.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$9.9M59%
    5 awards
  2. Department of the Air Force$3.4M20%
    12 awards
  3. Federal Acquisition Service$3.4M20%
    3 awards
  4. National Institutes of Health$216.1K1.3%
    1 awards
  5. Department of Veterans Affairs$13.2K0.1%
    1 awards
  6. Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$16.6M99%
  2. Other equipment & supplies$250.8K1.5%
  3. Research & development$5000.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Monterey County, CA$7.6M45%
  2. District of Columbia, DC$3M18%
  3. Bexar County, TX$2.3M14%
  4. Hancock County, MS$1.4M8.0%
  5. Los Angeles County, CA$1.2M7.3%
  6. Portsmouth city, VA$821.3K4.9%
  7. El Paso County, CO$427K2.5%
  8. San Francisco County, CA$23.7K0.1%
  9. Madison County, AL$5000.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition69%
    US 39% · $11.7M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions69%
    US 8.8% · $11.7M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. HPE GREENLAKE SERVICES$22M
    Department of the Navy· Monterey County, CA· IT & telecom· Aug 25, 2023 – May 28, 2026· N0018923FR056
  2. HPE HARDWARE PURCHASE$3M
    Federal Acquisition Service· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Feb 27, 2026 – Aug 24, 2026· 47QACA26F0119
  3. HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTER (HPC) UPGRADE IN SUPPORT OF THE NAVAL OCEANOGRAPHIC OFFICE (NAVOCEANO)$1.4M
    Department of the Navy· Hancock County, MS· IT & telecom· Mar 24, 2026 – Mar 30, 2026· N0018926FL057
  4. AFDW- S.HUNTER/R.WILLIAMS JUNIPER LICENSES$1.1M
    Department of the Air Force· Bexar County, TX· IT & telecom· Aug 25, 2023 – Dec 11, 2025· FA701423F0276
  5. NIPR HPE ALLETRA 5050 STORAGE UPGRADE SERVER REFRESH$974.1K
    Department of the Air Force· Los Angeles County, CA· IT & telecom· Jan 14, 2026 – Jan 14, 2026· FA281626F0010
  6. GSA 2GIT IS THE MANDATORY SOURCE VEHICLE FOR THIS NETAPP FILER HARDWARE AND INFORMATION MIGRATION.$870.8K
    Department of the Air Force· Tom Green County, TX· IT & telecom· Jul 11, 2025 – May 5, 2026· FA303025F0040
  7. VE4 HARDWARE REQUIREMENT - NASA SEWP FOR ORGANIZATION LSUBP00056 - 2026, AMS: N65236-26-RFPREQ-LSUBP00056-0012$821.3K
    Department of the Navy· Portsmouth city, VA· IT & telecom· Feb 10, 2026 – Mar 16, 2026· N6523626FE088
  8. NHLBI HPE GREENLAKE HCI SYSTEM$648.3K
    National Institutes of Health· Bexar County, TX· IT & telecom· May 16, 2024 – Aug 25, 2026· 75N92024F00111

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $1.4M (8 subawards)

4 primes

  1. GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.$898.2K65%
    FAIRFAX, VA · 4 subawards
  2. JACOBS TECHNOLOGY INC.$238.9K17%
    TULLAHOMA, TN · 1 subaward
  3. ASRC FEDERAL SYSTEM SOLUTIONS, LLC$123.2K8.9%
    BELTSVILLE, MD · 1 subaward
  4. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$121.2K8.8%
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 2 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $24.9M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $18.6M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $19.8M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $66.8M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $88.7M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $1.4M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

19 companies · $220.2M reported

  1. ATLANTIC DIVING SUPPLY, INC.$190.2M
    VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 250 subawards · Machinery, equipment, and supplies merchant wholesalers
  2. PARSONS GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC.$8.4M
    CENTREVILLE, VA · 17 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. PERATON ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS LLC$8M
    CHANTILLY, VA · 30 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 15 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. JMA RESOURCES, INC.$44.5M−48% in FY2026
    MECHANICSBURG, PA · 57% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Computer systems design and related services
  2. MALASHA TECHNOLOGIES INC$37.1M+6.6% in FY2026
    WEST CHESTER, OH · 51% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Computer systems design and related services
  3. C4 PLANNING SOLUTIONS, LLC$69.8M−7.7% in FY2026
    BLYTHE, GA · 57% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.