Federal contractor · SEATAC, WA

MACDONALD-MILLER FACILITY SOLUTIONS LLC

MACDONALD-MILLER FACILITY SOLUTIONS LLC received $58.7K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (+216% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $2.9M. Its largest customer was National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration ($58.7K).

Obligations · FY2026
$58.7K
New awards
2
Sole-source
94%
Single offer
6.3%
UEI
MVT7GNVMULE6
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 72KFY2017
  2. 678.1KFY2018
  3. 1.1MFY2019
  4. 290.6KFY2020
  5. 12.2KFY2021
  6. 496KFY2022
  7. 233.1KFY2023
  8. 23.7KFY2024
  9. 18.6KFY2025
  10. 58.7KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$58.7K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $58.7K
  • Sole-source awards94%
    US 30% · $55K
  • Single-offer competitions6.3%
    US 8.7% · $3,725
  • Urgency justifications94%
    US 5.1% · $55K

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Commerce · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· King County, WA· Equipment maintenance· Jul 28, 2026 – Jul 28, 2026· 1333MF26P0081
  2. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· Kitsap County, WA· Equipment maintenance· Jul 17, 2026 – Jul 17, 2026· 1333MF26P0076

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $402.6K (4 subawards)

1 prime

  1. VIGOR MARINE LLC$402.6K100%
    PORTLAND, OR · 4 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $4.4M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $421.1K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $1.4M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $1.3M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $4.2M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $402.6K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $12.1M reported

  1. PORTLAND, OR · 44 subawards · Ship and boat building
  2. PASCAGOULA, MS · 4 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. GERMANTOWN, MD · 2 subawards · Facilities support services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ROCKVILLE, MD · 58% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration · Building equipment contractors
  2. JUNEAU, AK · 53% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration · Building equipment contractors
  3. CHECK ELECTRIC LLC$70K−100% in FY2026
    KEY WEST, FL · 58% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration · Building equipment contractors

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.