Federal contractor · PORTLAND, OR

VIGOR MARINE LLC

VIGOR MARINE LLC received $694.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 27 awards (+56% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $4B. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($658.6M).

Obligations · FY2026
$694.2M
New awards
27
Sole-source
53%
Single offer
33%
UEI
L7ZETMM4M9R3
Parent company
VIGOR INDUSTRIAL LLC
Other than small businessForeign-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

4 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $769.1M in FY2026 together.

  1. VIGOR MARINE LLCPORTLAND, OR · Family page
    $694.2M
  2. VIGOR WORKS LLCCLACKAMAS, OR
    $74.9M
  3. $0
  4. $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 169MFY2017
  2. 191.4MFY2018
  3. 498.7MFY2019
  4. 576.5MFY2020
  5. 304MFY2021
  6. 352.5MFY2022
  7. 309.2MFY2023
  8. 448.4MFY2024
  9. 444.2MFY2025
  10. 694.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 15 awards
  2. 8 awards
  3. 2 awards
  4. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$671.3M97%
  2. Facilities & utilities$21.4M3.1%
  3. Transportation & logistics$1.5M0.2%
  4. Other equipment & supplies$2,7600.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. King County, WA$118.4M17%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition86%
    US 39% · $595.3M
  • Sole-source awards53%
    US 30% · $367M
  • Single-offer competitions33%
    US 8.8% · $228.2M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards
  2. Department of Transportation · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· King County, WA· Equipment maintenance· Sep 25, 2019 – Oct 16, 2025· N0002419C4447
  2. Department of the Navy· King County, WA· Equipment maintenance· Oct 25, 2024 – Jun 1, 2026· N0002425C4402
  3. Department of the Navy· Multnomah County, OR· Equipment maintenance· Apr 13, 2026 – Apr 27, 2026· N0002426C4411
  4. Department of the Navy· Snohomish County, WA· Equipment maintenance· Nov 8, 2023 – Feb 17, 2026· N4523A24C0551
  5. Department of the Navy· Multnomah County, OR· Equipment maintenance· Dec 20, 2024 – Jun 12, 2026· N0002425C4409
  6. Department of the Navy· Multnomah County, OR· Equipment maintenance· Jan 30, 2026 – Jun 12, 2026· N3220526C0006
  7. Department of the Navy· Multnomah County, OR· Equipment maintenance· Aug 28, 2024 – May 22, 2026· N0002424C4407
  8. Department of the Navy· Multnomah County, OR· Equipment maintenance· Feb 13, 2026 – Jun 3, 2026· N3220526C1223

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $41.4M (203 subawards)

119 sub-recipients

  1. ALPHARETTA, GA · 8 subawards
  2. EVERETT, WA · 8 subawards
  3. PERFORMANCE CONTRACTING INC$2.6M6.3%
    VANCOUVER, WA · 7 subawards
  4. IMIA, LLC$2M4.8%
    SPANISH FORT, AL · 9 subawards
  5. PACIFIC RIVER, LLC$1.9M4.5%
    BRUSH PRAIRIE, WA · 3 subawards
  6. TUKWILA, WA · 1 subaward
  7. NEWTOWN SQUARE, PA · 5 subawards
  8. WALPOLE, MA · 4 subawards
  9. BENDER CCP, INC.$819.1K2.0%
    VERNON, CA · 3 subawards
  10. KENT, WA · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 6.0% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $101.3M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2022: $38.3M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2023: $90.5M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $85.3M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $256.4M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2026: $41.4M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

418 companies · $698.9M reported

  1. HERNDON, VA · 65 subawards · Ship and boat building
  2. ALPHARETTA, GA · 53 subawards · Ship and boat building
  3. EVERETT, WA · 42 subawards · Ship and boat building

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $57.7M reported

  1. SAINT LOUIS, MO · 30 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. FORT WORTH, TX · 17 subawards · Other support services
  3. MELBOURNE, FL · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BLUEFORGE ALLIANCE$1.3B+21% in FY2026
    BRYAN, TX · 72% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Ship and boat building
  2. AUSTAL USA, LLC$2.5B−55% in FY2026
    MOBILE, AL · 72% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Ship and boat buildingU.S. Coast Guard · Ship and boat building
  3. PASCAGOULA, MS · 2 entities · 31% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Ship and boat building

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.