Federal contractor · EL PASO, TX

MARCO FEDERAL SERVICES LLC

MARCO FEDERAL SERVICES LLC received $6.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 15 awards (−28% vs FY2025). Since FY2018: $41.2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($4.6M).

Obligations · FY2026
$6.7M
New awards
15
Sole-source
77%
Single offer
6.2%
UEI
V9LRAFZKHNP3
Small businessVeteran-ownedMinority-owned8(a) program
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $6.7M in FY2026 together.

  1. MARCO FEDERAL SERVICES LLCEL PASO, TX · Family page
    $6.7M
  2. MARCO FEDERAL SERVICES, LLCEL PASO, TX
    $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-29

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 207.2KFY2018
  2. 624.6KFY2019
  3. 309.1KFY2020
  4. 2.6MFY2021
  5. 3.8MFY2022
  6. 8.1MFY2023
  7. 9.6MFY2024
  8. 9.3MFY2025
  9. 6.7MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Air Force$4.6M69%
    9 awards
  2. Department of the Army$1.9M28%
    4 awards
  3. U.S. Coast Guard$133.3K2.0%
    1 awards
  4. Department of the Navy$73K1.1%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$5.2M77%
  2. Construction & real property$892.4K13%
  3. Transportation & logistics$569.2K8.5%
  4. Equipment maintenance$73K1.1%

Where the work was performed

  1. Oklahoma County, OK$2M29%
  2. El Paso County, CO$1.2M18%
  3. Prince George County, VA$890K13%
  4. Pima County, AZ$851.4K13%
  5. Tom Green County, TX$643.8K9.6%
  6. El Paso County, TX$569.2K8.5%
  7. Orange County, NY$413.7K6.2%
  8. Cape May County, NJ$133.3K2.0%
  9. Beaufort County, SC$73K1.1%
  10. Erie County, PA$2,4390.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition83%
    US 39% · $5.6M
  • Sole-source awards77%
    US 30% · $5.2M
  • Single-offer competitions6.2%
    US 8.7% · $413.7K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Air Force$3.6M
    Department of Defense · 4 awards

Largest awards

  1. ISWM/REFUSE SERVICES, TINKER AFB FY25$3.9M
    Department of the Air Force· Oklahoma County, OK· Facilities & utilities· Oct 1, 2024 – Mar 12, 2026· FA810125C0003
  2. MOVERS & HANDLERS SERVICES$3.9M
    Department of the Army· El Paso County, TX· Transportation & logistics· Dec 17, 2021 – May 15, 2026· W911SG22P0009
  3. REFUSE AND RECYCLING$3.5M
    Department of the Air Force· El Paso County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Jan 25, 2024 – Apr 27, 2026· FA700024C0001
  4. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR KENNER ARMY HEALTH CLINIC (KAHC) AT FORT GREGG-ADAMS, VA$2.4M
    Department of the Army· Prince George County, VA· Construction & real property· Aug 13, 2024 – May 8, 2026· W9127824C0043
  5. REFUSE AND RECYCLING COLLECTION AT THE FACILITIES KELLER ARMY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, JOHNSON VETERINARY TREATMENT FACILITY, MEDICAL WAREHOUSE, PTMS AND CALL CENTER BUILDING, AT WEST POINT, NEW YORK.$1.9M
    Department of the Army· Orange County, NY· Facilities & utilities· Jun 14, 2022 – Jun 11, 2026· W911SD22C0005
  6. PRESQUE ISLE BEACH NOURISHMENT$1.7M
    Department of the Army· Erie County, PA· Construction & real property· Aug 1, 2025 – Nov 13, 2025· W912P425FA031
  7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE WASTE COLLECTION, RECYCLING SERVICES, AND CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION ON GOODFELLOW AFB AT LOCATIONS DESIGNATED IN THE CONTRACT AND PWS.$655.5K
    Department of the Air Force· Tom Green County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Jan 15, 2026 – Jan 15, 2026· FA303026F0010
  8. INTEGRATED SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT$606.1K
    Department of the Air Force· Tom Green County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Jan 31, 2024 – Mar 4, 2026· FA303024F0015

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 9 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BIFFA WASTE SERVICES LIMITED$10.2M−29% in FY2026
    HIGH WYCOMBE, GBR · 39% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Waste collection
  2. GUAHAN WASTE CONTROL, INC.$26M−56% in FY2026
    TAMUNING, GU · 43% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Waste collection
  3. PERRY MANAGEMENT CORP OF SOUTH DAKOTA, L.L.C$36.5M−33% in FY2026
    WAHIAWA, HI · 50% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Waste collectionArmy · Waste collection

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.