Federal contractor · SANTA ANA, CA

MARWAY POWER SYSTEMS, INC

MARWAY POWER SYSTEMS, INC received -$4,832 in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−111% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($19.2K).

Obligations · FY2026
-$4,832
New awards
4
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
UXVTFYJT5PN7
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 295.6KFY2017
  2. 136.2KFY2018
  3. 210.2KFY2019
  4. 178.9KFY2020
  5. 210KFY2021
  6. 12.6KFY2022
  7. 256KFY2023
  8. 143.6KFY2024
  9. 43.5KFY2025
  10. -4.8KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$19.2K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Defense Contract Management Agency· Orange County, CA· Equipment maintenance· May 13, 2019 – Dec 18, 2025· FA851719P0006
  2. Department of the Air Force· Orange County, CA· Equipment maintenance· Jun 18, 2024 – Oct 24, 2025· FA851724F0029
  3. Department of the Navy· Orange County, CA· IT & telecom· May 27, 2026 – May 27, 2026· N0010426PNB73
  4. Department of the Air Force· Orange County, CA· Equipment maintenance· Jun 14, 2024 – Oct 10, 2025· FA851724F0022

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $802.7K (6 subawards)

5 primes

  1. RESTON, VA · 1 subaward
  2. KANSAS CITY, MO · 2 subawards
  3. TUCSON, AZ · 1 subaward
  4. LEIDOS, INC.$85.9K11%
    RESTON, VA · 1 subaward
  5. CEDAR RAPIDS, IA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $2.4M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $1.4M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $7.3M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $1.9M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $2.7M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $802.7K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

13 companies · $18.4M reported

  1. TUCSON, AZ · 20 subawards · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  2. RESTON, VA · 13 subawards · Other electrical equipment and component manufacturing
  3. RESTON, VA · 7 subawards · Data processing, hosting, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MIVATEK GLOBAL LLC$113.9K+3.4% in FY2026
    CHADDS FORD, PA · 58% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenance
  2. OKINAWA DENKO CO.,LTD.$99.8K+3.4% in FY2026
    NAHA, JPN · 55% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenance
  3. MONTICELLO, MN · 58% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenance

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.