Federal contractor · CEDAR RAPIDS, IA

ROCKWELL COLLINS, INC.

ROCKWELL COLLINS, INC. received $374.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 617 awards (−59% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $6.9B. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($132.2M). It also received $84.1K in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$374.9M
New awards
617
Sole-source
84%
Single offer
0.4%
UEI
J4Q3HP6NHK47
Parent company
RTX CORP
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the RAYTHEON COMPANY company family: 227 registered entities, $25.3B in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. RAYTHEON COMPANYTUCSON, AZ · Family page
    $10.9B
  2. RTX CORPORATIONEAST HARTFORD, CT
    $3.9B
  3. RAYTHEON COMPANYANDOVER, MA
    $3.4B
  4. RAYTHEON COMPANYMARLBOROUGH, MA
    $1.2B
  5. RAYTHEON COMPANYMCKINNEY, TX
    $1.1B

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 632.2MFY2017
  2. 566.9MFY2018
  3. 546.5MFY2019
  4. 598.7MFY2020
  5. 511.1MFY2021
  6. 723.9MFY2022
  7. 943.7MFY2023
  8. 1BFY2024
  9. 925.2MFY2025
  10. 374.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$132.2M35%
    31 awards
  2. Department of the Navy$91.2M24%
    228 awards
  3. Department of the Air Force$87.6M23%
    50 awards
  4. Defense Contract Management Agency$47.5M13%
    147 awards
  5. Defense Logistics Agency$13.8M3.7%
    155 awards
  6. Federal Emergency Management Agency$1.7M0.5%
    2 awards
  7. U.S. Coast Guard$851.6K0.2%
    2 awards
  8. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency$90.9K0.0%
    1 awards
  9. Department of State$37.7K0.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$175.4M47%
  2. Professional services$80.9M22%
  3. IT & telecom$49.6M13%
  4. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$45.3M12%
  5. Equipment maintenance$15.5M4.1%
  6. Research & development$8.2M2.2%

Where the work was performed

  1. Linn County, IA$302.9M81%
  2. Johnson County, IA$45.5M12%
  3. Collin County, TX$23.3M6.2%
  4. St. Mary's County, MD$3.1M0.8%
  5. El Paso County, CO$1.3M0.4%
  6. Winneshiek County, IA$51.5K0.0%
  7. Abroad$37.7K0.0%
  8. Kern County, CA$15.4K0.0%
  9. Clayton County, GA$12K0.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition84%
    US 39% · $316.5M
  • Sole-source awards84%
    US 30% · $315.2M
  • Single-offer competitions0.4%
    US 8.7% · $1.3M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Navy$87.9M
    Department of Defense · 72 awards
  2. Department of the Air Force$87M
    Department of Defense · 13 awards
  3. Department of the Army$82.7M
    Department of Defense · 12 awards
  4. Defense Contract Management Agency$48.1M
    Department of Defense · 85 awards
  5. Defense Logistics Agency$7.5M
    Department of Defense · 63 awards

Largest awards

  1. TCTS INCREMENT II (TCTS INC II)$401.2M
    Department of the Navy· Linn County, IA· Research & development· Mar 28, 2017 – Jan 28, 2026· N6134017C0007
  2. MANPACK FULL RATE PRODUCTION (FRP) 3 PROCUREMENT$179.4M
    Defense Contract Management Agency· Linn County, IA· IT & telecom· May 23, 2023 – Jan 21, 2026· W15P7T23F0041
  3. MANPACK FULL RATE PRODUCTION (FRP)4 COMPETITIVE PROCUREMENT AWARD OF RADIO TRANSMITTERS, WARRANTIES, RELATED ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT, AND SERVICES INCLUDING KEY PERSONNEL TRAINING, SECURITY, SOFTWARE AND TOOLS FOR LOADING RADIOS, CONFIGURATION CONTROL.$142.5M
    Department of the Army· Linn County, IA· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 11, 2024 – Jun 2, 2026· W15P7T24F0062
  4. MANPACK FY21 COMPETITIVE PROCUREMENT.$139M
    Department of the Army· Linn County, IA· IT & telecom· Sep 23, 2021 – Jan 9, 2026· W15P7T21F0083
  5. GENERATION 2 MANPACK RADIO RECEIVER/TRANSMITTERS FULL RATE PRODUCTION (FRP) - 5 IN SUPPORT OF PROJECT MANAGER TACTICAL RADIOS/PRODUCT MANAGER HANDHELD, MANPACK AND SMALL FORM FIT.$134M
    Department of the Army· Linn County, IA· IT & telecom· Jun 25, 2025 – May 15, 2026· W15P7T25F0068
  6. MANPACK GEN 2 FY22 COMPETITIVE PROCUREMENT.$124.9M
    Department of the Army· Linn County, IA· IT & telecom· Sep 6, 2022 – Jan 7, 2026· W15P7T22F0057
  7. MANPACK GEN 2 PROGRAM LOW RATE INITIAL PROCUREMENT FOR MANPACK RADIOS AND ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT, DELIVERY ORDER 08.$108.1M
    Department of the Army· Linn County, IA· Other equipment & supplies· Apr 22, 2020 – Jan 6, 2026· W15P7T20F0133
  8. PROCUREMENT OF UP TO 1,641 MAPS GEN II SYSTEMS FOR THE US ARMY AND USMC$104.2M
    Department of the Army· Linn County, IA· Other equipment & supplies· Jul 31, 2024 – Apr 6, 2026· W56KGY24F0033

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

ROCKWELL COLLINS, INC. received $84.1K in federal assistance in FY2026, on 5 actions (0 new awards), −74% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 12.002 · Procurement Technical Assistance for Business Firms ($84.1K).

Assistance · FY2026
$84.1K
New awards
0
Actions
5
Since FY2025
$403.2K

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 319.1KFY2025
  2. 84.1KFY2026

By type

  1. Other assistance$84.1K100%

Top programs

  1. 12.002 · Procurement Technical Assistance for Business Firms$84.1K100%

Awarding agencies

  1. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency$84.1K100%
    Department of Defense

Largest awards

  1. ROBUST QUANTUM SENSORS (ROQS) TECHNICAL AREA 2$403.2K
    12.002 · Procurement Technical Assistance for Business Firms· Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency· Other financial assistance· Jun 10, 2025 – Aug 12, 2026· HR00112530155

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2025–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $2.3M (26 subawards)

15 sub-recipients

  1. TEVET LLC$1.2M53%
    GREENEVILLE, TN · 9 subawards
  2. BAE SYSTEMS INFORMATION AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS INTEGRATION INC.$225.9K9.6%
    CEDAR RAPIDS, IA · 1 subaward
  3. TOWER SYSTEMS, INC.$148.3K6.3%
    WATERTOWN, SD · 3 subawards
  4. AERO SIMULATION, INC.$144.7K6.2%
    TAMPA, FL · 1 subaward
  5. PORT ELECTRONICS CORPORATION$97.3K4.2%
    LAWRENCE, MA · 2 subawards
  6. GENTEX CORPORATION$61.1K2.6%
    SIMPSON, PA · 1 subaward
  7. DLT SOLUTIONS, LLC$59.3K2.5%
    HERNDON, VA · 1 subaward
  8. UNITED ELECTRONIC INDUSTRIES INC$57K2.4%
    NORWOOD, MA · 1 subaward
  9. COTSWORKS INC$52.7K2.3%
    HIGHLAND HEIGHTS, OH · 1 subaward
  10. ROHDE & SCHWARZ USA, INC.$51.1K2.2%
    COLUMBIA, MD · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $11.1M (24 subawards)

12 primes

  1. L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$6.8M61%
    SALT LAKE CITY, UT · 2 subawards
  2. SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORP$2.8M25%
    STRATFORD, CT · 3 subawards
  3. GENERAL ATOMICS AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS, INC.$2.6M23%
    POWAY, CA · 2 subawards
  4. THE BOEING COMPANY$2.5M23%
    RIDLEY PARK, PA · 5 subawards
  5. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$1.8M16%
    EL SEGUNDO, CA · 1 subaward
  6. THE BOEING COMPANY$580.2K5.2%
    SEATTLE, WA · 3 subawards
  7. SIERRA NEVADA COMPANY, LLC$226.8K2.0%
    ENGLEWOOD, CO · 2 subawards
  8. DRS NETWORK & IMAGING SYSTEMS, LLC$151.7K1.4%
    MELBOURNE, FL · 2 subawards
  9. THE BOEING COMPANY$49.9K0.4%
    OKLAHOMA CITY, OK · 1 subaward
  10. BOEING COMPANY, THE$45K0.4%
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 0.6% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $10.2M paid out · $1.5B received
  • FY2022: $32.2M paid out · $206.8M received
  • FY2023: $52.3M paid out · $238M received
  • FY2024: $26.8M paid out · $735.3M received
  • FY2025: $19M paid out · $63.8M received
  • FY2026: $2.3M paid out · $11.1M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

2,986 companies · $42.6B reported

  1. L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P.$5B
    GREENVILLE, TX · 377 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. TTM TECHNOLOGIES, INC$4.3B
    STERLING, VA · 297 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. TRIO MANUFACTURING INC$4.3B
    EL SEGUNDO, CA · 336 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Primes that pay it

164 companies · $36.5B reported

  1. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$20.2B
    FORT WORTH, TX · 6,713 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS OF SANDIA, LLC$7B
    ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 123 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. THE BOEING COMPANY$4.8B
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 2,203 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 214 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$171.9B−38% in FY2026
    FORT WORTH, TX · 128 entities · 76% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Contract Management Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing+13 more
  2. THE BOEING COMPANY$74.6B+20% in FY2026
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 99 entities · 47% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Contract Management Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing+10 more
  3. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$41.6B−14% in FY2026
    MELBOURNE, FL · 159 entities · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing+16 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of RAYTHEON COMPANY (227 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • RTX CORPORATIONAI match · 100%
  • Raytheon Technologies (formerly Raytheon Company)AI match · 99%
  • Digital Force Technologies (formerly known as Adelos)AI match · 98%
  • Sparton CorporationAI match · 96%
  • Raytheon Technologies CorporationAI match · 90%
Lobbying · 2025
$13.9M
39 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$47.2M
$47.2M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$1.2M
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$11.4M
    43 reports
  2. 2024$13.5M
    43 reports
  3. 2025$13.9M
    39 reports
  4. 2026$8.4M
    21 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense117 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations80 reports
  3. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code35 reports
  4. Aerospace30 reports
  5. Aviation, aircraft and airlines26 reports
  6. Transportation19 reports
  7. Homeland security15 reports
  8. Communications, broadcasting, radio and TV14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. SENATE131 reports
  2. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES129 reports
  3. Defense - Dept of (DOD)29 reports
  4. Natl Security Council (NSC)18 reports
  5. Executive Office of the President (EOP)11 reports
  6. Transportation - Dept of (DOT)9 reports
  7. Commerce - Dept of (DOC)7 reports
  8. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)7 reports
  9. Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA)4 reports
  10. Director of National Intelligence (ODNI)4 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. American Defense International, Inc.$880K
    14 reports
  2. Invariant LLC$760K
    12 reports
  3. S-3 Group$640K
    10 reports
  4. Forbes-Tate$570K
    10 reports
  5. DLA Piper LLP (US)$390K
    8 reports
  6. Vantage Point Strategies LLC$260K
    13 reports
  7. Thorn Run Partners$260K
    7 reports
  8. INNOVATIVE FEDERAL STRATEGIES, LLC$240K
    6 reports

22 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$591K51%
  2. Democratic$559K48%
  3. Other or none$6,0000.5%

PACs sponsored

  • EMPLOYEES OF RTX CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$2.4M raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.