Federal contractor · ROCHESTER, MN

MAYO COLLABORATIVE SERVICES, INC.

MAYO COLLABORATIVE SERVICES, INC. received $5.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 25 awards (−26% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $63.1M. Its largest customer was National Institutes of Health ($3.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$5.2M
New awards
25
Sole-source
35%
Single offer
5.1%
UEI
JWSMJMBLTN44
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the MAYO CLINIC company family: 7 registered entities, $37.1M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. MAYO CLINICROCHESTER, MN · Family page
    $29.9M
  2. MAYO CLINIC AMBULANCEROCHESTER, MN
    $1.8M
  3. MAYO CLINIC ARIZONASCOTTSDALE, AZ
    $148.1K
  4. MAYO CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM-SOUTHWEST MINNESOTA REGIONMANKATO, MN
    $102.7K
  5. MAYO CLINICROCHESTER, MN
    $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3.6MFY2017
  2. 3.7MFY2018
  3. 5.2MFY2019
  4. 6.9MFY2020
  5. 10.6MFY2021
  6. 6MFY2022
  7. 7.3MFY2023
  8. 7.7MFY2024
  9. 6.9MFY2025
  10. 5.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. National Institutes of Health$3.3M64%
    6 awards
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs$1.8M36%
    19 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Health & medical$5.2M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Montgomery County, MD$3.3M63%
  2. Hennepin County, MN$625K12%
  3. Cuyahoga County, OH$549.4K11%
  4. Maricopa County, AZ$374.9K7.3%
  5. Dallas County, TX$192.3K3.7%
  6. Multnomah County, OR$89K1.7%
  7. Olmsted County, MN$45.7K0.9%
  8. Bexar County, TX$21.4K0.4%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition40%
    US 39% · $2.1M
  • Sole-source awards35%
    US 30% · $1.8M
  • Single-offer competitions5.1%
    US 8.8% · $262.6K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs$1.8M
    Department of Veterans Affairs · 10 awards

Largest awards

  1. REFERENCE LABORATORY TESTING$2.4M
    National Institutes of Health· Montgomery County, MD· Health & medical· Jan 8, 2026 – Apr 13, 2026· 75N90026F00001
  2. REFERENCE LABORATORY TESTING SERVICES$915K
    National Institutes of Health· Montgomery County, MD· Health & medical· Jan 8, 2026 – Jun 8, 2026· 75N90026F00002
  3. VISN 23 REFERENCE LABORATORY TESTING SERVICES MAYO$650K
    Department of Veterans Affairs· Hennepin County, MN· Health & medical· Dec 2, 2025 – Dec 2, 2025· 36C26326N0268
  4. REFERENCE LAB TESTING & INTERPRETATION SERVICES$620.3K
    Department of Veterans Affairs· Multnomah County, OR· Health & medical· Oct 1, 2022 – Jun 10, 2026· 36C26023P0009
  5. LAB REFERENCE TESTING$549.4K
    Department of Veterans Affairs· Cuyahoga County, OH· Health & medical· Apr 16, 2026 – Jul 22, 2026· 36C25026P0534
  6. PATHOLOGY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE SERVICES - OY4$501.6K
    Department of Veterans Affairs· Olmsted County, MN· Health & medical· Dec 12, 2024 – May 7, 2026· 36C26325N0301
  7. MAYO REFERENCE LAB TESTING$432.3K
    Department of Veterans Affairs· Maricopa County, AZ· Health & medical· Jun 24, 2025 – Apr 15, 2026· 36C26225P1455
  8. REFERENCE LAB TESTING$264.1K
    Department of Veterans Affairs· Maricopa County, AZ· Health & medical· Jun 29, 2026 – Jun 29, 2026· 36C26226P1169

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

194 companies · $173.9M reported

  1. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO, THE$14.9M
    SAN FRANCISCO, CA · 22 subawards
  2. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA$13.4M
    MINNEAPOLIS, MN · 90 subawards
  3. THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK$8.1M
    NEW YORK, NY · 33 subawards

Primes that pay it

143 companies · $236.8M reported

  1. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA$28.2M
    MINNEAPOLIS, MN · 64 subawards
  2. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, THE$20.2M
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 114 subawards
  3. THE GENERAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION$17.2M
    BOSTON, MA · 7 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 19 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY$89M+27% in FY2026
    LEXINGTON, KY · 4 entities · 70% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons · General medical and surgical hospitals
  2. THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT FORT WORTH$92.8M+4.2% in FY2026
    FORT WORTH, TX · 2 entities · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons · General medical and surgical hospitals
  3. INTEGRATED MEDICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC$110.7M+56% in FY2026
    MANSFIELD, TX · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons · General medical and surgical hospitals

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of MAYO CLINIC (7 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Mayo ClinicAI match · 100%
  • Mayo Collaborative Services, Inc.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$1.1M
24 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$3.5M
$3.5M in its own reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$740K
    13 reports
  2. 2024$1.1M
    21 reports
  3. 2025$1.1M
    24 reports
  4. 2026$620K
    10 reports

Top issues

  1. Medicare and Medicaid43 reports
  2. Health issues40 reports
  3. Medical and disease research, clinical labs8 reports
  4. Government issues2 reports
  5. Defense1 reports
  6. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code1 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES54 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE54 reports
  3. Health & Human Services - Dept of (HHS)11 reports
  4. Centers For Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)8 reports
  5. Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA)4 reports
  6. Executive Office of the President (EOP)1 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Mehlman Consulting, Inc.$720K
    14 reports
  2. Welsh Rose, LLC$600K
    10 reports
  3. Chamber Hill Strategies$420K
    7 reports
  4. RAMPY STRATEGIES, LLC$180K
    3 reports
  5. McDermott Will & Schulte LLP$150K
    14 reports
  6. Rampy Northrup LLC$50K
    1 reports
  7. Manatt, Phelps, and Phillips$30K
    5 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.