Federal contractor · SACRAMENTO, CA

MBK ENGINEERS

MBK ENGINEERS received $1.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (+211% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $11.2M. Its largest customer was Bureau of Reclamation ($1.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.9M
New awards
4
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
DVE6MLSWSK35
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 188.1KFY2017
  2. 621.4KFY2018
  3. 235.7KFY2019
  4. 652KFY2020
  5. 901.1KFY2021
  6. 696.2KFY2022
  7. 655.3KFY2023
  8. 4.7MFY2024
  9. 606.1KFY2025
  10. 1.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Bureau of Reclamation$1.9M100%
    4 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$1.9M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Sacramento County, CA$1.3M70%
  2. Klamath County, OR$564K30%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICE FOR THE ANALYSIS OF THE NORTH TO SOUTH WATER TRANSFER TO SUPPORT DRY AND DROUGHT CONDITION ACTIVITIES THROUGHOUT THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA$4.9M
    Bureau of Reclamation· Sacramento County, CA· Professional services· Feb 20, 2024 – Jul 21, 2026· 140R2024P0011
  2. ASSIST WITH FORECASTING CARRY-OVER WATER STORAGE IN UPPER KLAMATH LAKE AND STREAM INFLOW INTO THE WATERSHED SYSTEM, INCLUDING MODELING HYDROLOGICAL CHANGES TO THE KLAMATH RIVER FOLLOWING THE REMOVAL OF FOUR HYDROELECTRIC DAMS.$1.1M
    Bureau of Reclamation· Klamath County, OR· Professional services· Sep 18, 2025 – Jul 29, 2026· 140R2025P0070
  3. MODEL DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT CALSIM MODEL LOGIC$694.7K
    Bureau of Reclamation· Sacramento County, CA· Professional services· Apr 18, 2023 – Dec 18, 2025· 140R2023P0027
  4. EO 14398 - CALSIM 3 MODEL DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATIONS ANALYSIS$330.9K
    Bureau of Reclamation· Sacramento County, CA· Professional services· Jun 11, 2026 – Jun 11, 2026· 140R2026P0053

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $212.7K reported

  1. STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.$212.7K
    DENVER, CO · 1 subaward · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ASIR LLC$3.7M+25% in FY2026
    ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 52% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Reclamation · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. MIKIBA, LLC$5.6M−41% in FY2026
    ALLEN, TX · 60% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Reclamation · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. FISHBIO$3.5M+183% in FY2026
    OAKDALE, CA · 48% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Reclamation · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.