Federal contractor · WARNER, NH

MCIVER TYLER

MCIVER TYLER received $74.4K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (+26% vs FY2025). Since FY2018: $460.5K. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($74.4K).

Obligations · FY2026
$74.4K
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
DVCNBQJEAS84
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 42.6KFY2018
  2. 46.6KFY2019
  3. 77.4KFY2020
  4. 37.3KFY2021
  5. 51.5KFY2022
  6. 55.9KFY2023
  7. 15.5KFY2024
  8. 59.2KFY2025
  9. 74.4KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$74.4K100%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$74.4K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Merrimack County, NH$61.9K83%
  2. Hillsborough County, NH$12.6K17%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. GROUNDS MAINTENANCE SERVICES, HOPKINTON LAKE, HOPKINTON, NH AND EVERETT LAKE, WEARE, NH$91.5K
    Department of the Army· Merrimack County, NH· Facilities & utilities· Mar 31, 2025 – Mar 17, 2026· W912WJ25P0048
  2. SNOW REMOVAL, SHOVELING, AND SANDING SERVICES, HOPKINTON LAKE, HOPKINTON, NH$27.4K
    Department of the Army· Merrimack County, NH· Facilities & utilities· Nov 21, 2023 – Oct 16, 2025· W912WJ24P0013
  3. SNOW REMOVAL SERVICES, EVERETT DAM, WEARE, NH.$26.6K
    Department of the Army· Hillsborough County, NH· Facilities & utilities· Nov 16, 2023 – Oct 16, 2025· W912WJ24P0012

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CURB APPEAL SERVICES INC$153.7K−100% in FY2026
    COTTONDALE, FL · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings
  2. REINKE JEFF L$155.5K+11% in FY2026
    CENTER, ND · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings
  3. MICHAEL CALIGUIRI$156.5K−19% in FY2026
    RUTLAND, VT · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.