Federal contractor · MCLEAN, VA

MCR FEDERAL, LLC

MCR FEDERAL, LLC received $13.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−43% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $360M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($7.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$13.1M
New awards
4
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
F2LNMXNJ3GN1
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 25MFY2017
  2. 30.5MFY2018
  3. 29.1MFY2019
  4. 38.8MFY2020
  5. 46.5MFY2021
  6. 42.9MFY2022
  7. 53.7MFY2023
  8. 57.4MFY2024
  9. 23MFY2025
  10. 13.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 3 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$5.9M45%
  2. Professional services$4.1M31%
  3. IT & telecom$3.1M24%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · -$148
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · -$148
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Alexandria city, VA· IT & telecom· Apr 30, 2020 – Apr 27, 2026· FA880620F0002
  2. Department of the Air Force· Alexandria city, VA· Professional services· Feb 27, 2019 – May 13, 2026· FA881919F1004
  3. Federal Acquisition Service· El Paso County, CO· Research & development· Sep 22, 2021 – Sep 24, 2026· 47QFPA21F0071
  4. Department of the Air Force· Alexandria city, VA· Professional services· Nov 7, 2019 – Apr 21, 2026· FA880220F0003

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $32.6M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $33.6M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $3.7M received
  • FY2024: $125.2K paid out · $200K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1 company · $125.2K reported

  1. WASHINGTON, DC · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $70.1M reported

  1. BURLINGTON, MA · 95 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. RESTON, VA · 9 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. HOUSTON, TX · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. DAVIDSON TECHNOLOGIES INC$95.3M+310% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 2 entities · 81% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  2. ARCTOS TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC$97.5M−38% in FY2026
    BEAVERCREEK, OH · 2 entities · 81% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  3. QUANTECH SERVICES INC.$59.2M−34% in FY2026
    LEXINGTON, MA · 63% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesFederal Acquisition Service · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.