Federal contractor · BEAVERCREEK, OH

ARCTOS TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC

ARCTOS TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC received $24.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 27 awards (−38% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $362.4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($21M).

Obligations · FY2026
$24.3M
New awards
27
Sole-source
0.9%
Single offer
52%
UEI
HX4BQCW632M9
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $24.3M in FY2026 together.

  1. ARCTOS TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLCBEAVERCREEK, OH · Family page
    $24.3M
  2. ARCTOS TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLCTORRANCE, CA
    $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 54.1MFY2017
  2. 32.9MFY2018
  3. 38.9MFY2019
  4. 27.3MFY2020
  5. 52.1MFY2021
  6. 25.8MFY2022
  7. 33.8MFY2023
  8. 33.7MFY2024
  9. 39.5MFY2025
  10. 24.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Air Force$21M86%
    13 awards
  2. Federal Aviation Administration$3.2M13%
    11 awards
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration$119K0.5%
    2 awards
  4. Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$21M86%
  2. Professional services$3.2M13%
  3. IT & telecom$66.3K0.3%
  4. Equipment maintenance$52.6K0.2%

Where the work was performed

  1. Montgomery County, OH$13.9M57%
  2. Greene County, OH$6.7M28%
  3. District of Columbia, DC$3.2M13%
  4. Brevard County, FL$570.7K2.3%
  5. Montgomery County, PA$52.6K0.2%
  6. Madison County, AL$5000.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition53%
    US 39% · $12.8M
  • Sole-source awards0.9%
    US 30% · $216.3K
  • Single-offer competitions52%
    US 8.8% · $12.6M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Federal Aviation Administration$150K
    Department of Transportation · 1 awards
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration$66.3K
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. RAPID ASSESSMENT, MATURATION, PROTOTYPING, AND TRANSITION OF EMERGING STRUCTURAL TECHNOLOGIES$78.7M
    Department of the Air Force· Montgomery County, OH· Research & development· Apr 21, 2022 – Jun 4, 2026· FA865022C5292
  2. TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT$17.2M
    Department of the Air Force· Greene County, OH· Research & development· Dec 22, 2023 – May 28, 2026· FA239124FB001
  3. HIGH SPEED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT$9.2M
    Department of the Air Force· Montgomery County, OH· Research & development· Mar 31, 2021 – Mar 25, 2026· FA865021F2019
  4. MATERIALS INTEGRATED NANO-/OPTO-ELECTRONIC STRUCTURES (MINOS)$5.6M
    Department of the Air Force· Montgomery County, OH· Research & development· May 1, 2024 – Jan 29, 2026· FA239424FB006
  5. MANUFACTURING OF ORDINANCE TASK ORDER- FOR MITS EFFORT B$4.8M
    Department of the Air Force· Montgomery County, OH· Research & development· Dec 26, 2017 – Mar 9, 2026· FA865018F5573
  6. SYSTEMS MODELING OF EFFECTIVENESS$2.9M
    Department of the Air Force· Montgomery County, OH· Research & development· Jan 15, 2021 – Apr 8, 2026· FA865021F2204
  7. TASK ORDER AWARD FOR ASA-200 OPERATIONS SUPPORT$1.8M
    Federal Aviation Administration· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Jul 2, 2026 – Aug 24, 2026· 693KA926F00108
  8. SHARP SUPPORT III IS THE DESIGNATION FOR THE HARDWARE, SOFTWARE, AND PROCEDURES USED TO PERFORM FLIGHT ANALYSIS AND RISK ANALYSIS BY SLD 45 SAFETY OFFICE ANALYSTS IN SUPPORT OF SPACE LAUNCH MISSIONS AT THE EASTERN RANGE (ER).$1M
    Department of the Air Force· Brevard County, FL· Research & development· Dec 10, 2025 – May 26, 2026· FA252126F0055

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

ARCTOS TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0
Since FY2021
$0

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 0FY2021
  2. 0FY2023
  3. 0FY2024

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2021–FY2024.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $1.6M (3 subawards)

3 primes

  1. AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC.$1.1M69%
    SEATTLE, WA · 1 subaward
  2. KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC$398.1K25%
    GREENBELT, MD · 1 subaward
  3. SIERRA SPACE CORP$93.8K5.9%
    LOUISVILLE, CO · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $4M paid out · $2.4M received
  • FY2022: $3.4M paid out · $11.5M received
  • FY2023: $9.5M paid out · $7.1M received
  • FY2024: $5M paid out · $5.7M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $4.2M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $1.6M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

43 companies · $22M reported

  1. KBR SERVICES, LLC$2.9M
    HOUSTON, TX · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. IERUS TECHNOLOGIES INC$2M
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. RADIANCE TECHNOLOGIES INC$1.6M
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

16 companies · $32.5M reported

  1. SAWDEY SOLUTION SERVICES INC$10.6M
    BEAVERCREEK, OH · 11 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. AZIMUTH CORPORATION$4M
    BEAVERCREEK, OH · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. BATTELLE ENERGY ALLIANCE, LLC$3.9M
    IDAHO FALLS, ID · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 11 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. DAVIDSON TECHNOLOGIES INC$95.3M+310% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 2 entities · 90% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  2. AXIENT LLC$104.2M−40% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 2 entities · 88% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. MCR FEDERAL, LLC$93.6M−43% in FY2026
    MCLEAN, VA · 77% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of ARCTOS TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC (2 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • ArctosAI match · 92%
Lobbying · 2023
$120K
3 reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$120K
    3 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense3 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES3 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE3 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. J.A. Green and Company (formerly LLC)$120K
    3 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.