Federal contractor · MC LEAN, VA

MDW ASSOCIATES, LLC

MDW ASSOCIATES, LLC received $7.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (+75% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $16.1M. Its largest customer was Washington Headquarters Services ($4.5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$7.9M
New awards
6
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
YPKDLLNUQT54
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 354.2KFY2017
  2. 363.1KFY2018
  3. 369.4KFY2019
  4. -8.8KFY2021
  5. 2.6MFY2024
  6. 4.5MFY2025
  7. 7.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$7.9M100.0%
  2. Research & development$5000.0%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency· Arlington County, VA· Professional services· Aug 12, 2024 – Oct 15, 2025· HR001124F0465
  2. Washington Headquarters Services· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Feb 13, 2025 – Mar 31, 2026· HQ003425F0085
  3. Washington Headquarters Services· Arlington County, VA· Professional services· May 29, 2026 – May 29, 2026· HQ003426FE261
  4. Department of the Navy· Orange County, CA· Professional services· Aug 25, 2021 – Mar 24, 2026· NW01
  5. Department of the Navy· Shelby County, AL· Professional services· Jul 22, 2019 – Jan 28, 2026· N0017819F8092
  6. Missile Defense Agency· Fairfax County, VA· Research & development· Dec 19, 2025 – Dec 19, 2025· HQ085926FF462

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $780.2K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. CHANTILLY, VA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $7.7M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $1.3M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $1.5M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $7.5M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $2.6M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $780.2K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $21.4M reported

  1. VIENNA, VA · 39 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. CHANTILLY, VA · 4 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. GB3TS, LLC$4.3M−100% in FY2026
    JUNEAU, AK · 28% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveWashington Headquarters Services · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  2. MORGAN 6, LLC$26.9M−46% in FY2026
    CHARLESTON, SC · 52% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveWashington Headquarters Services · Other professional, scientific, and technical servicesWashington Headquarters Services · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. ACT1 FEDERAL LLC$37.9M−70% in FY2026
    ARLINGTON, VA · 2 entities · 46% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveWashington Headquarters Services · Other professional, scientific, and technical services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.