Federal contractor · ANN ARBOR, MI

MERATIVE US L.P.

MERATIVE US L.P. received $1.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−11% vs FY2025). Since FY2019: $8.6M. Its largest customer was Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ($808.2K).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.5M
New awards
6
Sole-source
93%
Single offer
6.7%
UEI
EPZLUC1Q5CU1
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 156.2KFY2019
  2. 237.5KFY2020
  3. 456.6KFY2021
  4. 1.4MFY2022
  5. 1.5MFY2023
  6. 1.8MFY2024
  7. 1.7MFY2025
  8. 1.5MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$907K61%
  2. IT & telecom$562K38%
  3. Other equipment & supplies$9,4320.6%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $1.5M
  • Sole-source awards93%
    US 30% · $1.4M
  • Single-offer competitions6.7%
    US 8.8% · $98.8K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Health and Human Services · 1 awards
  2. Department of Justice · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention· Washtenaw County, MI· Professional services· Sep 13, 2024 – Aug 13, 2026· 75D30124C19804
  2. Departmental Offices· Washtenaw County, MI· IT & telecom· Sep 20, 2022 – Jul 9, 2026· 140D0422P0203
  3. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Financial Resources· Washtenaw County, MI· IT & telecom· Aug 19, 2026 – Aug 19, 2026· 7571TE26P00095
  4. Office of the Secretary· Washtenaw County, MI· Professional services· Jun 25, 2026 – Jun 25, 2026· 1331L526P13210029
  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention· San Francisco County, CA· IT & telecom· Aug 18, 2023 – Jun 9, 2026· 75D30123P17640
  6. Offices, Boards and Divisions· Washtenaw County, MI· Other equipment & supplies· Dec 15, 2025 – Dec 15, 2025· 15JL1B26P00000077

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $45.5K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. SANTA MONICA, CA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $224.9K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $335.6K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $178.2K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $45.5K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $784.2K reported

  1. DURHAM, NC · 3 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. SANTA MONICA, CA · 2 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. BETHESDA, MD · 1 subaward · Data processing, hosting, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 13 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CARSON CITY, NV · 20% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · Administration of human resource programs
  2. TOPEKA, KS · 19% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · Administration of human resource programs
  3. BALTIMORE, MD · 5 entities · 26% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · Administration of human resource programs

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.